Real Facts are as under:
West discourages sex till the age of 16:
Western laws are based upon human logic and rationale and thus much better than religious laws.
- West simply discourage sex before 16 years and ask the adults (over 18 years) to respect this law.
- But at the same time, West has not declared sex of boys/girls of 12 to 16 years to be a CRIME. No, if they indeed want to indulge in sexual activity, then the West understands that it could be a natural human need.
- In case young boys and girls decide to do sex, then West provide them with the Sex Education in the schools at time when they are about 12 years old. This way, children understand how to indulge in "safe sex" and they know how to avoid the dangers in sexual activities (like becoming pregnant and thus dangers of birth etc.).
- West also separated sexual pleasure with the "responsibilities" of marriage. Sexual activity is ok for Youngs, but these are the responsibilities of marriage which break the youth at this tender age.
Faults in the Religious System:
The so-called religious system is full of faults and injustices towards the girls.
- First of all, this is a big lie that a girl can only be married after the age of 9 years. No, the true Religious Sharia Ruling is that even a breastfeeding baby girl can be married to even an old man by her father/guardian without her consent (i.e. a minor girl is not in a position of giving any consent).
- And the husband has the permission to undress the baby (or child bride of and age like 5 or 6 or 7 years old) and to kiss her naked body and to drive all kind of sexual pleasures from her (like letting her to masturbate him, to rub his penis in her thighs etc.). These are not our words, but these are exactly the words of Fatwas of the last 1400 years (link). Only due to this single fact should all human beings abandon religion.
- As far as sexual 'penetration' is concerned, then it is the husband who has to decide when she is healthy enough to bear the pressure of penetration at the age of 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 years. And during penetration, if he caused permanent damage to her (by making her vagina and anus one), then still he has not committed a crime. Again, these are the exact words of the Fatwas of the last 1400 years (link).
Mistake of Religion: Sex is connected with the Responsibilities of Marriage
Sex at age of 13 or 14 or 15 is not a problem at such. But the problem arises when you connect it with compulsory responsibilities of marriage.
- Marriage means a small girl has to leave her parents and house, and to move to the house of a person who is completely stranger to him.
- In the new house, she gets new responsibilities, including obeying the husband in his sexual desires and getting pregnant and getting babies.
- Children of 12, 13, 14 and 15 may be able to enjoy the sex, but surely, they are mentally not mature enough to select their life partners. But religion absolutely does not care about it.
These things make sex at age of 13/14 years totally different than a marriage at 13/14 years, and marriage is a huge psychological burden upon 13/14 years old children.
Islam snatches away the right from Children to indulge in "Natural Love" with each other
- Love is 'natural', but Islam is not 'natural'.
- According to religion, the love of Romeo and Juliet was against modesty and a crime. And the lovers should be punished for this crime.
- Religion allows the guardians to marry their daughters at age of 6, 7, or 8 (even without their consents) with any guy (even if he is an old man) and then 'compel' them to not to look at any other boy in their age group, or to talk to them and to get in love with him.
- Religion is the killer of the 'natural Love'.
Thus, all those who say that Islam is a religion of nature, they all are wrong.
Islam and the slave-girls
Islam uses the slave women as "prostitutes".
Yes, religion allows man to buy a slave woman (or a slave girl of 6 or 7 years), then have temporary sexual relationship with her, and when once he has fulfilled his lust, then he could hand her over to his brother. And after all his brother raped her one by one, then she could be sold to new master in the market who again rapes her and then sell her to another master.
To be fair, Islam was involved in it (as it followed the Custom of Arabs who had a culture of ignorance).
As compared to Islam, the other 2 Abrahamic Religions (i.e. Judaism and Christianity) didn't allow such "temporary" sexual relationship with the slave women. They allowed only "marrying" them and after marriage their status became like of a free woman which could not be sold any further.
Institution of Family:
Religious people claim that the West and its system destroyed the family system and the divorce rate got high in the west. But again, they are wrong here.
Divorce rate is directly proportional to how much "Liberty" women have. If women are financially strong and educated, then they will not let the husbands to exploit and blackmail them.
In religious societies, women were forced to live with the husbands, even if she does not want to live with him.
Divorce rate has gone not only high in the Western world, but it has also gone very high in the Muslim countries which are rich and where women don't need to stay with the abusing husbands.
- The divorce rate in UAE and Qatar and Kuwait (link) has gone about 60% (which is even higher than many western countries).
- Even in Saudi Arabia, the divorce rate is close to 50%.
- In Iran too, women are still not so rich, but still divorce rate has gone higher which they have become educated.
As compared to the Islamic countries, there are poor religion free countries like Vietnam, where divorce rate is the least in whole world under 1%. It was due to the fact that they were poor and they needed a strong family system in order to survive.
Similarly, China (an atheist nation) had very low divorce rate for thousands of years, while as poor they need strong family system to survive. Today, the divorce rate in China and Vietnam is also going high, while they have become richer and strong family system in not needed any more to survive.
Objections by Islam Apologists:
Mass pornography and the fact that it is being deliberately made available to children as young as 5 or 6, is not "discouraging" sexuality, on the contrary.
It is a false allegation. No one is deliberately making pornography available to the 5 or 6 years old, but there is a restriction of 18 years upon pornography.
Same goes for the increasing trend in western media to portray children and young teenagers in a sexualized manner or making them mimic adults.
Criticism upon it is already present in Western societies and movies and dramas are no longer presenting young kids as sexual objects.
How strange, religious people cry for dramas and films where kids play the roles, but they forget that their religion is thousands of times worse here while it allows marriage and sexual activities with minor girls of 5 or 6 years too.
This is a plain misrepresentation. Because these classes are compulsory, not optional.
Off course sex educational classes are compulsory and they should not be optional as probability is already present that young kids may indulge in sexual activities.
Same probability is also present in Islamic countries of young kids indulging in sex activities, but Islamic societies just turn blind eyes from this fact.
And their goal is not to help children avoid supposed "dangers", but very much to sexualize them at young age,
False. Sex education is about making kids aware of the dangers, which are related to the sexual activities.
and also to dissociate biological and "assumed" gender identity in their poor innocent minds, as per the injunctions of the predominant homosexualist ideology.
Homosexuality is present in Human Nature. The religious system is at fault here as it goes against Nature.
Look, no one teaches kids in any Islamic Country to be homosexual, but all kids are taught Islamic teachings which portray homosexuality as the biggest sin etc. But despite all this religious brainwashing, automatically Muslims involve in homosexual activities, while this thing is present in their nature.
It is uncontrolled, boundless, expansive and unfettered sexuality, not the responsibilities of marriage, which breaks young people.
Off course these are the responsibilities of marriage which break the young girls.
Religious marriage means that the guardian of the girl could marry her to even an old guy without her consent.
And then religious marriage means that husband could compel the child wife to provide him the sexual services at his demand, and her consent means nothing. She has to let her be used as a sexual object even if she hates her husband.
And this is totally different from the sexual enjoyment that is allowed in the Western countries. This is fully controlled sexual activity where no one could compel the young girl to provide other sexual services. And it is so much controlled that even if during sex, girls say NO MORE, then it is the end of the sexual activity.
Thousands of years of Tradition mostly produced successive generations of mentally healthy individuals, liberal-masonic modernity however generates hordes of uprooted, zombified, neurotic wrecks.
This is a conjecture without any proof.
There were many cultures in the world who did not even wear clothes and who lived totally naked for thousands of years. But they didn't produce any zombies for thousands of years.
What more, even thousands of slave women were present in the Islamic society with their naked breasts. Religion didn't allow the poor slave women to take hijab (which it was considered only the honour and right of the free Muslim women).
Says someone not actually qualified in sharia law...
This is the worst excuse, as we have not said a single word at our own, but these are the clear WORDS of Fatwas of ALL Scholars of Islam of the last 1400 years that even a breastfeeding baby could be married to any person (even if he is an old man) by the guardian without her consent.
And then husband is allowed to undress her and to kill her naked body and to rub his penis in her thighs and to make her to masturbate him .... These are the EXACT words of these Fatwas, and not a single word has been added by us.
Leave it to those in the know, namely to legitimate religious authorities.
No, we could not leave this matter as the so called legitimate religious authorities of last 1400 years have already given their Fatwa. And these religious authorities and the religion they represent are both criminals in our eyes in this issue. So, why should we leave them and not criticize them for this shameful ruling?
I posted abundant evidence for the networked paedocriminal activities of oligarchs in secular so-called "democracies". As said, a Mossad agent like Epstein alone raped thousands of children to his own admission. An endless list of elites from so-called "democracies" attended his paedocriminal rape sessions.
All such people are criminals as they are involved in these activities at an individual level against the State and its law.
While the problem of Religion is this that it's proposed State Religious Law is itself CRIMINAL and involves all these activities.
The experience from time-tested Tradition says otherwise. Until masons and Zionists deliberately took aim at said Tradition and turned any notion of decency upside down.
These so-called time-tested Religious Traditions are marrying babies and raping dozens of slave women after buying them in Muta type temporary sexual relationship.
What? Now love is known as Demagogy by Religion?
Love is natural, and no religion could win an argument against natural Love. Thus, please answer it, instead of hiding behind words like demagogy.
In western liberal society however, slavery is practiced right now as we speak. For instance, by organized criminal groups forcing women into prostitution, and so on.
They are criminal gangs and not the State Law. Such criminal gangs are also active in Islamic countries and diamond markets are present in all Muslim countries.
Increase in divorce rate is not related to Western System, but it is related to Human Nature. Whenever women get educated and stronger and get equal rights as humans, the rate of divorce will increase while they no longer let husbands to exploit and blackmail them.
And you know in which case the separation rate is ZERO and woman always stays with husband if he wills? YES ...WHEN WOMAN IS A SLAVE OF THE MAN.
Religion decreased the rights of the woman and brought her close to be a slave in this regard. And upon this oppression of woman, religious people boast for having a strong family system.
A functional family is an anthropological and psychological need of human beings.
An oppressive family is absolutely not an anthropological and psychological need of human beings, but it is the cause of depression of human beings.
A divorced and separately living family is much better for human needs as compared to a family where oppression is taking place and there is fighting and abuse taking place every day.