FOLLOW US:

Muslim preachers spread a lot of hate against the Western world by preaching that:

The West denounces Islamic Sharia for marrying a 9 years old girl and demands that Muslims should not wed their daughters till 18 years. But the West doesn't feel ashamed that small girls are doing sex at the age of 12 years in their own western societies. The West is simply a hypocrite. 

But contrary to this propaganda of Muslim preachers, the real facts are different. 

Table of Contents:

West discourages sex till the age of 16:

Western laws are based upon human logic and rationale and thus much better than religious laws.

  • The West simply does not encourage sex before 16 years and asks adults (over 18 years) to respect this law.
  • But at the same time, the West has not declared the sex of boys/girls of 12 to 16 years to be a CRIME. No, if they indeed want to indulge in sexual activity, then the West understands that it could be a natural human need.
  • In the case young boys and girls decide to do sex, then the West provides them with Sex Education in schools at the time when they are about 12 years old. This way, children understand how to indulge in "safe sex" and they know how to avoid the dangers of sexual activities (like becoming pregnant and thus dangers of birth etc.).

Difference between sex at 12 years in the West and marriage at 9 in Islamic societies

Sex at age of 13 or 14 or 15 is not a problem at such. But the problem arises when you connect it with the compulsory responsibilities of marriage. Thus, the West also separated sexual pleasure from the "responsibilities" of marriage. These are the responsibilities of marriage which break the youth at this tender age.

But a marriage of a small girl at 9 years in Islamic societies means:

  • Islam compels a 9 years old small girl to leave her loving parents and family and house and friends and move to a family and place which are stranger to her. Alone this is a huge stress for a small girl.
  • And it is only about SEX in Islamic marriage, and not about LOVE. The husband is often many years elder than the small 9 years old girl, and even an old man of 50 years in some cases. And he is also often a total stranger to that 9 years old girl. This goes in the direction of RAPE instead of LOVE. 
  • A 9 years old small girl is not in a mental position to give her consent for a partner for the whole of her life. If the husband turns to be abusive, then it is almost next to impossible for such a girl to get rid of him. Please read our article: Khul’ خلع (i.e. getting freedom from husband) is not a “right” of a woman, but it is still a “right” of a husband to either grant it or deny it 🔥ʰᵒᵗ
  • Then Islam turns her into a child-producing machine at 9, while the Islamic Prophet wanted to feel proud over other prophets due to the big number of his Ummah. 
  • Please read the extreme dangers to 9 years old (or teen mothers till 20) and their babies. The rate of death and complications is many times higher as compared to the 20-25 years old mothers and their babies. The DATA is not Islamophobic, and you can read this data here: EXTREME dangers and harms to 9 years old Mothers and their babies (Is DATA Islamophobic too?)

Faults in the Religious System:

The so-called religious system is full of faults and injustices towards girls.

  • First of all, this is a big lie that a girl can only be married after the age of 9 years. No, the true Religious Sharia Ruling is that even a breastfeeding baby girl can be married to even an old man by her father/guardian without her consent (i.e. a minor girl is not in a position of giving any consent). 
  • And the husband has the permission to undress the baby (or child bride of age like 5 or 6 or 7 years old) and to kiss her naked body and to drive all kinds of sexual pleasures from her (like letting her to masturbate him, to rub his penis in her thighs etc.). These are not our words, but these are exactly the words of Fatwas of the last 1400 years (link). Only due to this single fact should all human beings abandon religion.
  • Islam also has an evil of "Slavery by Birth". And it also allows a master to separate a six months old child (when he/she gets 2 teeth) from his/her slave mother and sell her in the Islamic Bazaars of Slavery. Thus, Muslim men were buying small slave girls from the Bazaars, and using them for their sexual pleasure.

For details, please read our article: Crimes of Islamic Slavery against Humanity 

Islam snatches away the right from Children to indulge in "Natural Love" with each other

  • Love is 'natural', but Islam is not 'natural'.
  • According to religion, the love of Romeo and Juliet was against modesty and a crime. And the lovers should be punished for this crime. 
  • Religion allows the guardians to marry their daughters at age of 6, 7, or 8 (even without their consent) with any guy (even if he is an old man) and then 'compel' them not to look at any other boy in their age group, or to talk to them and to get in love with him.
  • Religion is the killer of 'natural Love'.

Thus, all those who say that Islam is a religion of nature, they are wrong.

Institution of Family:

Religious people claim that the West and its system destroyed the family system and the divorce rate got high in the west. But again, they are wrong here.

The divorce rate has gone up, while in this modern era, humans don't need the support of their families/tribes to survive. That is why both the family system, and the Tribal system got weaker today. 

Muslim preachers blame the family system became weak while the West gave unnecessary LIBERTIES to women.

But the complete truth is, the Islamic system EXPLOITED weak women, and it usurped many of their rights as human beings. The WEST only stopped this exploitation and gave women EQUAL Human Rights. 

The basic issue remains the same due to modern technology, people (both men and women) do not any longer depend on their families to survive, and this is the main reason for the weakening of the family system today. That is why, not only family system became weaker, but also the TRIBAL system (extended Family system) also became weaker, and women and their equal human rights have no ROLE in the weakening of the Tribal/Extended Family System. 

Thus, blaming only women and their equal human rights is not completely true, but men are also equally responsible for this. 

The divorce rate has gone not only higher in the Western world, but it has also gone very high in Muslim countries which are rich and where women don't need to stay with the abusive husbands.

  • The divorce rate in UAE and Qatar and Kuwait (link) has gone about 60% (which is even higher than many western countries).
  • Even in Saudi Arabia, the divorce rate is close to 50%.
  • In Iran too, women are still not so rich, but still divorce rate has gone higher as they have become educated.

As compared to the Islamic countries, there are poor religion-free countries like Vietnam, where the divorce rate is the least in the whole world under 1%. It was due to the fact that they were poor and they needed a strong family system in order to survive.

Similarly, China (an atheist nation) had a very low divorce rate for thousands of years, while they needed a strong family system to survive. Today, the divorce rate in China and Vietnam is also going high, while they have become richer and a strong family system in not needed any more to survive.

Objection:

A functional family is an anthropological and psychological need of human beings.

An oppressive family is absolutely not an anthropological and psychological need of human beings, but it is the cause of depression of human beings.

A divorced and separately living family is much better for human needs as compared to a family where oppression is taking place and there is fighting and abuse taking place every day.

Objections by Islam Apologists:

Objection:

Mass pornography and the fact that it is being deliberately made available to children as young as 5 or 6, is not "discouraging" sexuality, on the contrary.

It is a false allegation. No one is deliberately making pornography available to the 5 or 6 years old, but there is a restriction of 18 years upon pornography.

Objection:
Same goes for the increasing trend in western media to portray children and young teenagers in a sexualized manner or making them mimic adults.

Criticism of it is already present in Western societies and movies and dramas are no longer presenting young kids as sexual objects. 

How strange, religious people cry for dramas and films where kids play the roles, but they forget that their religion is thousands of times worse here while it allows marriage and sexual activities with minor girls of 5 or 6 years too.

Moreover, they also forget that Islam prohibited slave women to take hijabs and made them to move in public with naked breasts. So, what message did Islam send to small children with half-naked slave women, who were also raped by multiple Muslim masters? What message did Islamic Bazaars of slavery sent to small children where those half-naked slave women were put for auction, where Muslim customers were also allowed to touch their bodies? Was it any less than porno films? 

Objection:
This is a plain misrepresentation. Because these classes are compulsory, not optional.

Of course, sex education classes are compulsory and they should not be optional as the probability is already present that young kids may indulge in sexual activities. 
The same probability is also present in Islamic countries of young kids indulging in sexual activities, but Islamic societies just turn a blind eye to this fact. And Mullahs in Quran Schools take advantage of this absence of sex education, and they indeed rape many children. 

Objection:
And their goal is not to help children avoid supposed "dangers", but very much to sexualize them at young age,

False. Sex education is about making kids aware of the dangers, which are related to sexual activities. 

Objection:
and also to dissociate biological and "assumed" gender identity in their poor innocent minds, as per the injunctions of the predominant homosexualist ideology.

Homosexuality is present in Human Nature. The religious system is at fault here as it goes against Nature. Please read our article: Homosexuality (All objections of Islamic Preachers answered) 🔥ʰᵒᵗ

Look, no one teaches kids in any Islamic Country to be homosexual, but all kids are taught Islamic teachings which portray homosexuality as the biggest sin etc. But despite all this religious brainwashing, automatically many Muslims involve in homosexual activities, while this thing is present in their nature.

Objection:
It is uncontrolled, boundless, expansive and unfettered sexuality, not the responsibilities of marriage, which breaks young people.

Of course, these are the responsibilities of marriage which break young girls.

Religious marriage means that the guardian of the girl could marry her to even an old guy without her consent.

And then religious marriage means that the husband could compel the child-wife to provide him with sexual services at his demand, and her consent means nothing. She has to let her be used as a sexual object even if she hates her husband.

And this is totally different from the sexual enjoyment that is allowed in Western countries. This is fully controlled sexual activity where no one could compel a young girl to provide others with sexual services. And it is so much controlled that even if during sex, a girl says NO MORE, then it is the end of the sexual activity.

Objection:

Thousands of years of Tradition mostly produced successive generations of mentally healthy individuals, liberal-masonic modernity however generates hordes of uprooted, zombified, neurotic wrecks.

This is a conjecture without any proof. 

There were many cultures in the world that did not even wear clothes and who lived totally naked for thousands of years. But they didn't produce any zombies for thousands of years.

Moreover, even thousands of slave women were present in Islamic society with their naked breasts. Religion didn't allow the poor slave women to take hijab (which it was considered only the honour and right of the free Muslim women).

Objection:
I posted abundant evidence for the networked paedocriminal activities of oligarchs in secular so-called "democracies". As said, a Mossad agent like Epstein alone raped thousands of children to his own admission. An endless list of elites from so-called "democracies" attended his paedocriminal rape sessions.

All such people are criminals as they are involved in these activities at an individual level against the State and its law.

While the problem with Religion is that its proposed State Religious Law is itself CRIMINAL and involves in all these activities.

Objection:
In western liberal society however, slavery is practiced right now as we speak. For instance, by organized criminal groups forcing women into prostitution, and so on.

They are criminal gangs and not the State Law. Such criminal gangs are also active in Islamic countries and diamond markets are present in all Muslim countries.

Conclusion:

The increase in divorce rate is not related to Western System, but it is related to Human Nature.