Muhammad Created Sharia on His Own and Called it Revelation LATER

Sahih Muslim 1442b:

(The Prophet said) I intended to prohibit cohabitation with the suckling women, but (then) I considered the Greeks and Persians, and saw that they suckle their children and this thing (cohabitation) does not do any harm to them (to the suckling women).

This hadith is solid evidence that there is no entity named Allah in the sky. Rather, Muhammad himself was creating the laws and later attributing them to divine revelation. For those who possess reason, this single hadith is enough to bring down the entire edifice of Islam.

If the people of Persia and Rome did not exist, there would be a prohibition in Islamic law against having sex with nursing women, and Muslims would be bringing lame excuses for this scientific error just as they try to justify the scientific error regarding the waiting period of a pregnant woman.

Sunan Abi Dawud 2158:

(The Prophet said): It is not lawful for a man who believes in Allah and the last day to water what another has sown with his water (meaning intercourse with women who are pregnant)

But science clearly proves that Muhammad was mistaken about pregnancy. Once a woman is pregnant by one man, no matter how much another man has intercourse with her, it does not affect the fetus and no DNA changes take place in it. These were the beliefs of the age of ignorance that Muhammad followed. Due to Muhammad's error regarding pregnancy, a woman is once again the one to suffer. During pregnancy, she cannot marry another man, fulfill her sexual desires, gain another man's love and support, and is forced to endure the painful journey of pregnancy alone.

If a man shows love and attention to a pregnant woman, making her happy and ultimately benefiting the fetus, what could be wrong with that?

Why would religion advocate for a pregnant woman to stay alone and suffer, ultimately causing harm to both her and the fetus?

Furthermore, look at this hadith where Muhammad initially denied any punishment in graves, but later copied it from a Jewish woman. 

Sahih Muslim, 584:

'A'isha reported: The Prophet (ﷺ) entered my house when a Jewess was with me, and she was saying, "Do you know that you would be put to trial in the grave?" The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) trembled on hearing this and said, "It is the Jews ONLY who would be put to trial." 'A'isha said: We passed some nights, and then the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, "Do you know that it has been revealed to me: 'You would be put to trial in the grave'?"

For those who think and understand, this event contains complete signs that they may recognize the truth.

Details
Parent Category: en
Category: Divine Revelation OR a Human Drama?

Avoid this Trap

🛑 Before You Start Analysing Islam → Avoid this common trap (Recommended reading)

Latest Articles

Most Read Articles

Important Websites

Categories

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →