Table of Contents

 

Chapter 0: Free Will

0.1 Free will doesn’t exist

0.2 Hatred towards the Qadariyyah (People who believe in free will)

0.3 Allah is responsible for disbelief

Chapter 1: The Immorality of Islam:

1.1 Islamic Mistreatment of Women

Restrictive female dress code

Female subservience to men

Wifebeating

Islam worsened women’s rights in arabia

Female Intellectual Deficiency

Women should not be in Rulership

Polygamy

Female Objectification:

Female Impiety

Misogyny in Slave manumission:

Travel Restrictions

1.2 Mistreatment of Disbelievers

Muslim Supremacism

Disrespect to disbelievers

Hatred Towards Jews and Christians

Offensive Jihad and Fighting Disbelievers/Killing Apostates and Blasphemers

Allah’s punishment for not believing him

Destroying Holy Objects of other Religions

1.3 islam permits Slavery

———————————————————————————

Allah’s opinion of Slaves

Muhammad had no problem using slaves

Muhammad’s Black Slaves

Muhammad does not always support the freeing of slaves

1.4 Islam permits Sex slavery

1.5 Islam permits Raping female war captives

1.6 Islam permits Paedophilia

1.7 Islam commands Homophobia

1.8 Islamic animal cruelty

———————————————————————————

Dogs

Miscellaneous

1.9 Allah punishes people for crimes they haven’t committed.

BONUS: Faith over Family

Chapter 2: Islam as a tool of Political Control

———————————————————————————

2.1 Commands of Absolute Obedience to the Religion

2.2 The Ruling Class is Muhammad’s tribe

2.3 Using Religion to keep the masses obedient to the Ruling Class

2.4 Killing dissenters, blasphemers, and mockers

Chapter 3: Scientific/Historical Inaccuracies and errors

———————————————————————————

3.1 Islamic Medicine and human Biology

3.2 Islamic Atmospheric Mechanics

3.3 Islamic Oceanography

3.4 Islamic Astronomy

3.5 Islamic Weather Mechanics

3.6 Islamic mathematics

3.6 Islamic Historical Errors

Chapter 4: Fantastical Beliefs.

———————————————————————————

4.1 Sentient Trees and Stones

4.2 Mythical Creatures

4.3 The Dark Arts

———————————————————————————

4.4 Islamic Demonology

4.5 Therianthropy

4.6 Muslim Animals

4.7 Islamic Afterlife

Heaven

Hell

Chapter 5: False Prophecies

———————————————————————————

Chapter 6: Bad Qur’anic Preservation

———————————————————————————

6.1 Unreliability of Muhammad’s memory

6.2 Missing Text:

6.3 Disagreements between the sahaba about Qur’anic compilation

6.4 Changed verses in the Quran

Chapter 7: Qur’anic Plagiarism:

7.1 Jewish Talmud

7.2 Quran Adopting Legends

Chapter 8: Allah uses the last message to mankind to solve Muhammad’s personal problems:

———————————————————————————

8.1 Trivial Issues

8.2 Sex

8.3 Allah giving threats on behalf of Muhammad

Chapter 9: Infringements on Cultural and Daily Life

———————————————————————————

9.1 Arts

9.2 Food

9.3 Business

9.4 Fashion

9.5 Social Life

———————————————————————————

9.6 Reclining Etiquette

9.7 Toilet Rules

Chapter 10: Islam Adopting Pagan Beliefs

10.1 Hajj

10.2 Pagan traditions

 

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →