Zakir Naik: Girl is responsible for her rape if she is not covering her entire Body with Hijab

Please first watch this video, where Zakir Naik is telling that a girl is herself responsible for her rape if she comes out of her home without completely covering her body with Islamic Hijab. 

But what about slave girls?

Islam forced them not to wear the Hijab, and even kept their breasts naked in public. Even if any slave girl by mistake wore Hijab, then Umar Ibn Khattab used to hit her with a stick, and he removed her Hijab, and told her not to resemble FREE Muslim women by wearing the Hijab.

So, what if men raped those half naked slave girls? Who is then responsible for rape in this case?

Men, who raped them?

Or Islam, which forced them to go half naked in public?

The hypocrisy is undeniable. Islam blames free women for “tempting” men if they don’t cover their entire body with Islamic Hijab, but it deliberately denied slave women the very same “protection.” If the Hijab is really supposed to prevent rape, then why were slave girls forbidden from it?

In truth, the guilt does not lie on the shoulders of the victims, neither on the free women nor the enslaved ones. The true burden lies on a system of Islam that legalized slavery, enforced nakedness, and then excused men’s crimes.

Details

Avoid this Trap

🛑 Before You Start Analysing Islam → Avoid this common trap (Recommended reading)

Latest Articles

Most Read Articles

Important Websites

Categories

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →