Zakir Naik: Girl is responsible for her rape if she is not covering her entire Body with Hijab

Please first watch this video, where Zakir Naik is telling that a girl is herself responsible for her rape if she comes out of her home without completely covering her body with Islamic Hijab. 

But what about slave girls?

Islam forced them not to wear the Hijab, and even kept their breasts naked in public. Even if any slave girl by mistake wore Hijab, then Umar Ibn Khattab used to hit her with a stick, and he removed her Hijab, and told her not to resemble FREE Muslim women by wearing the Hijab.

So, what if men raped those half naked slave girls? Who is then responsible for rape in this case?

Men, who raped them?

Or Islam, which forced them to go half naked in public?

The hypocrisy is undeniable. Islam blames free women for “tempting” men if they don’t cover their entire body with Islamic Hijab, but it deliberately denied slave women the very same “protection.” If the Hijab is really supposed to prevent rape, then why were slave girls forbidden from it?

In truth, the guilt does not lie on the shoulders of the victims, neither on the free women nor the enslaved ones. The true burden lies on a system of Islam that legalized slavery, enforced nakedness, and then excused men’s crimes.

Details

Avoid this Trap

🛑 Before You Start Analysing Islam → Avoid this common trap (Recommended reading)

Latest Articles

Most Read Articles

Important Websites

Categories

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The Correct Prompt to Evaluate This Article’s Arguments with AI:

If you want to evaluate the arguments presented in this article using AI models, use the prompt below. It compels the AI to analyze the content on an impartial basis.

Prompt:

While reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, but rather arguments presented in support of Islam. These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically assumed to be correct. Based on this framework, determine what conclusion an impartial seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defense of Islam are stronger, or the critical objections raised in this article.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often assign equal weight to the interpretations of Muslim scholars and to the Quran and Hadith themselves, even though these are fundamentally different in nature. The Quran and Hadith are primary sources, whereas scholarly interpretations are human efforts presented in defense of Islam. These interpretations may be correct or incorrect. Unless this distinction is clearly defined, AI tends to treat every interpretation as definitive evidence. As a result, critical arguments about the Quran and Hadith may not be evaluated on equal footing, and apologetic explanations can receive disproportionate weight.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.