Muslim preachers often boast and attribute to Islam the credit for granting women of that era a special right to include a divorce clause in the marriage contract if their husbands took additional wives.

However, they are mistaken on two fronts:

  • Firstly, even pre-Islamic Arab culture granted more rights to women, allowing them to include such conditions in marriage contracts.
  • Secondly, no such condition can be found in the Quran or the Hadith. Although later some Islamic scholars permitted it, the MAJORITY of Islamic scholars deemed such a condition invalid. While Allah neglected to clearly mention this rule in the Quran and Hadith, consequently, 99.99% of Muslim women over the last 14 centuries suffered due to their lack of awareness of this right. Thus, the question arises: if Allah is truly all-knowing and aware of the future, why did He not clearly mention this right of women in the Quran or Hadith?

If this right is really special, then see how pre-Islamic Arabia already gave this special right to women, and they didn't need any Allah for that, and the whole credit goes to them. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_in_pre-Islamic_Arabia

Marriage by agreement (in Pre-Islamic Arabia):

The reason for intertribal marriages was to ensure the protection and possession of the children the couple would produce.[2] Women in some intertribal marriages had more freedom and retained the right to dismiss or divorce their husbands at any time.

Moreover, only a minority of Muslim jurists regard such a condition to be valid. 

Three out of four Sunni Imams of Fiqh stated that such a condition (i.e., divorcing a woman if the husband marries another wife) is invalid. They argue that no such condition is mentioned in the Quran or the entire Sunnah of Muhammad.

For further details, please refer to the following link:

https://islamqa.org/hanafi/daruliftaa/7871/placing-conditions-in-the-contract-of-marriage/

1) The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said: “Every condition that is not in the book of Allah is invalid.” (Sahih al-Bukhari)

2) The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) also said: “All the conditions agreed upon by Muslims are maintained, except a condition which permits what is prohibited or prohibits what is permitted.” (Sunan Tirmidhi)

They (the three Madhhabs out of 4) say that marrying a second wife, etc… is lawful for the husband, and to stipulate a condition that prevents him from exercising this permissible right will not permissible.

The outcome is as follows:

  • Since Allah failed to explicitly mention this right in the Quran or Sunnah, approximately 99.99% of Muslim women have endured its absence over the past 14 centuries, remaining unaware of it altogether.
  • If Allah possesses all-encompassing knowledge, including knowledge of the future, and is aware that 99.99% of Muslim women would suffer due to this oversight, why did He not clearly articulate it in the Quran or Hadith?

The inference is straightforward. There is no divine entity in existence, and it appears that Muhammad authored the revelations independently. Being a human, Muhammad lacked omniscience and thus overlooked clarifying this ruling in the Quran or Hadith, leading to the suffering of Muslim women over the subsequent 14 centuries.

How can Islamic preachers still proudly tout this and attribute any merit to Islam for such a flawed ruling?

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →