The mistake of the Jews was that they believed a person's "spiritual" soul would become impure due to the discharge of "physical" substances like menstrual blood from a woman or semen from a man. After such a physical impurity, they thought that a person could not touch or recite the sacred spiritual book, the Torah, nor perform other spiritual rituals. Their further foolishness was in believing that the way to purify the spiritual soul was by washing the physical body with physical water.

Prophet Muhammad adopted these Jewish laws directly into Islamic Sharia, where a menstruating woman's spiritual soul is also considered impure due to physical substance like menstruation. As a result, she is prohibited from reciting or touching the Quran (as if maturational blood comes out of her fingers), entering a mosque, or performing prayers. The same applies to a man after the discharge of semen, whether it occurs during sexual intercourse or due to a wet dream.

The Torah requires full immersion

Similarly, when air is expelled through the anus, it makes sense to wash the affected area for hygiene. However, when Islam requires performing ablution (wudu) after passing gas, involving washing only the hands, face, and feet—rather than cleaning the anus—it becomes illogical. 

Muslim Excuse: It is more essential to wash off the smelly semen after sex

Our Response:

Semen does not get on a person's head, hair, face, back, and many other parts, yet it is mandatory to bathe the entire body, including hair, after sex. In reality, to rid oneself of the semen, it is sufficient to wash only the affected areas where the semen has touched.

As previously discussed, the primary purpose of the ritual bath in both Judaism and Islam is not focused on physical cleanliness. Rather, it stems from the belief that physical substances like semen or menstrual blood cause spiritual impurity. This belief dictates that a person must undergo a physical cleansing ritual of the whole body before they can touch sacred texts like the Torah or the Quran, or engage in spiritual practices.

Islamic and Jewish Rituals: Making Life Difficult with Illogical Rulings

From a practical standpoint, it makes more sense to prioritize cleanliness before engaging in sexual activity. Being clean beforehand ensures that both partners can enjoy intimacy without discomfort, which is both logical and beneficial. While bathing after sex is advisable, it shouldn't be seen as mandatory. However, due to the emphasis on ritual purification in Islam, many Muslims might neglect pre-sex cleanliness, focusing instead on the required post-coital bath, as their religious practices, such as prayer, depend on it. They often avoid "double bathing," where they would bathe both before and after sex.

This is especially challenging for women with long hair, who find it extremely difficult to take two baths. It becomes a nightmare during winter. Even a single bath after sex is burdensome—imagine having to wake up early for Fajr prayer after fulfilling your husband’s sexual demands during the night. Women have to heat water, bathe, and then spend time drying their hair, all in the middle of the night.

Men also face unnecessary hardships due to this practice. Bathing early in the morning during winter, followed by going outside to the mosque for congregational prayers, increases the risk of illness. Similarly, heading to the office with wet hair can also lead to getting sick.

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →