The mistake of the Jews was that they believed a person's "spiritual" soul would become impure due to the discharge of "physical" substances like menstrual blood from a woman or semen from a man. After such a physical impurity, they thought that a person could not touch or recite the sacred spiritual book, the Torah, nor perform other spiritual rituals. Their further foolishness was in believing that the way to purify the spiritual soul was by washing the physical body with physical water.

Prophet Muhammad adopted these Jewish laws directly into Islamic Sharia, where a menstruating woman's spiritual soul is also considered impure due to physical substance like menstruation. As a result, she is prohibited from reciting or touching the Quran (as if maturational blood comes out of her fingers), entering a mosque, or performing prayers. The same applies to a man after the discharge of semen, whether it occurs during sexual intercourse or due to a wet dream.

The Torah requires full immersion

Similarly, when air is expelled through the anus, it makes sense to wash the affected area for hygiene. However, when Islam requires performing ablution (wudu) after passing gas, involving washing only the hands, face, and feet—rather than cleaning the anus—it becomes illogical. 

Muslim Excuse: It is more essential to wash off the smelly semen after sex

Our Response:

Semen does not get on a person's head, hair, face, back, and many other parts, yet it is mandatory to bathe the entire body, including hair, after sex. In reality, to rid oneself of the semen, it is sufficient to wash only the affected areas where the semen has touched.

As previously discussed, the primary purpose of the ritual bath in both Judaism and Islam is not focused on physical cleanliness. Rather, it stems from the belief that physical substances like semen or menstrual blood cause spiritual impurity. This belief dictates that a person must undergo a physical cleansing ritual of the whole body before they can touch sacred texts like the Torah or the Quran, or engage in spiritual practices.

Islamic and Jewish Rituals: Making Life Difficult with Illogical Rulings

From a practical standpoint, it makes more sense to prioritize cleanliness before engaging in sexual activity. Being clean beforehand ensures that both partners can enjoy intimacy without discomfort, which is both logical and beneficial. While bathing after sex is advisable, it shouldn't be seen as mandatory. However, due to the emphasis on ritual purification in Islam, many Muslims might neglect pre-sex cleanliness, focusing instead on the required post-coital bath, as their religious practices, such as prayer, depend on it. They often avoid "double bathing," where they would bathe both before and after sex.

This is especially challenging for women with long hair, who find it extremely difficult to take two baths. It becomes a nightmare during winter. Even a single bath after sex is burdensome—imagine having to wake up early for Fajr prayer after fulfilling your husband’s sexual demands during the night. Women have to heat water, bathe, and then spend time drying their hair, all in the middle of the night.

Men also face unnecessary hardships due to this practice. Bathing early in the morning during winter, followed by going outside to the mosque for congregational prayers, increases the risk of illness. Similarly, heading to the office with wet hair can also lead to getting sick.

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →