The Sky Taken Away

In the past, when homes lacked toilets and bathrooms, even women from the most conservative Muslim families had at least a small reason to step outside, to relieve themselves or to visit the public hammams for bathing. Those brief walks, though carried out under heavy veils and restrictions, still allowed them a momentary taste of freedom, of air, of sunlight, of existence beyond the walls that defined their lives.

But in today’s world, we have lost even that little escape.

The chains of modesty have tightened further. Now we spend endless days locked within concrete rooms, where neither sunlight touches our faces nor fresh air brushes our skin.

In the name of ghayrah, even the sky has been taken away from us.

This is the original message of a woman, which we have published here with only minor editorial changes.

It is important to note that this woman is not an ex-Muslim. According to her, she still considers herself a Muslim and has not yet seriously contemplated leaving Islam. Her only request was a simple one that we provide a space on our website for her feelings and her voice to be heard.

While her personal experience may not represent the diverse lives of all Muslim women globally, the fact remains that her lament is a profound echo of the suffocating reality endured by millions. For this reason, we recognize this pain as an undeniable truth, and we are publishing this elegy of her life.

Postscript: Although years have passed since I left Islam, as a man, I still find myself unable to fully grasp the true depth of this oppression. Every new testimony, every new realization, serves as a reminder that I still cannot see the world through a woman’s eyes, and perhaps I will never truly be able to comprehend the full agony of that confinement.

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The Correct Prompt to Evaluate This Article’s Arguments with AI:

If you want to evaluate the arguments presented in this article using AI models, use the prompt below. It compels the AI to analyze the content on an impartial basis.

Prompt:

While reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, but rather arguments presented in support of Islam. These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically assumed to be correct. Based on this framework, determine what conclusion an impartial seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defense of Islam are stronger, or the critical objections raised in this article.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often assign equal weight to the interpretations of Muslim scholars and to the Quran and Hadith themselves, even though these are fundamentally different in nature. The Quran and Hadith are primary sources, whereas scholarly interpretations are human efforts presented in defense of Islam. These interpretations may be correct or incorrect. Unless this distinction is clearly defined, AI tends to treat every interpretation as definitive evidence. As a result, critical arguments about the Quran and Hadith may not be evaluated on equal footing, and apologetic explanations can receive disproportionate weight.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.