The Sky Taken Away

In the past, when homes lacked toilets and bathrooms, even women from the most conservative Muslim families had at least a small reason to step outside, to relieve themselves or to visit the public hammams for bathing. Those brief walks, though carried out under heavy veils and restrictions, still allowed them a momentary taste of freedom, of air, of sunlight, of existence beyond the walls that defined their lives.

But in today’s world, we have lost even that little escape.

The chains of modesty have tightened further. Now we spend endless days locked within concrete rooms, where neither sunlight touches our faces nor fresh air brushes our skin.

In the name of ghayrah, even the sky has been taken away from us.

This is the original message of a woman, which we have published here with only minor editorial changes.

It is important to note that this woman is not an ex-Muslim. According to her, she still considers herself a Muslim and has not yet seriously contemplated leaving Islam. Her only request was a simple one that we provide a space on our website for her feelings and her voice to be heard.

While her personal experience may not represent the diverse lives of all Muslim women globally, the fact remains that her lament is a profound echo of the suffocating reality endured by millions. For this reason, we recognize this pain as an undeniable truth, and we are publishing this elegy of her life.

Postscript: Although years have passed since I left Islam, as a man, I still find myself unable to fully grasp the true depth of this oppression. Every new testimony, every new realization, serves as a reminder that I still cannot see the world through a woman’s eyes, and perhaps I will never truly be able to comprehend the full agony of that confinement.

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →