There are many knowledgeable Muslims who are doubtful about Islam. However, their journey of doubting Islam often ends with the question, "What existed before the Big Bang?" And when they fail to find an answer to this question, they continue to cling to Islam and accept Allah as a true god. But this is wrong, and it occurs only when they believe that leaving Islam requires denying the existence of any deity (i.e., becoming atheists).

This assumption is incorrect. There is no requirement to reject the existence of any deity to abandon Islam.

Science has yet to discover the origin of matter. Therefore, until this question is fully addressed by science, every atheist will retain some degree of agnosticism – between 0.01% and 49%. That is, the possibility remains that one or more deities may exist. To gain a clearer understanding, please watch Dr. Richard Dawkins' video below.

Thus, it is not necessary to find the answer first regarding the origin of matter in order to leave religion. Rather, we only need to deny any religion that claims its "religious god" communicated messages to humans through angels.

Note that the debate over the existence or nonexistence of any deity is an internal discussion among atheists, agnostics, and deists. In contrast, the conversation with religious individuals focuses solely on their "religious god."

Moreover, do you know that some Islamic Preachers are teaching these TACTICS to Muslims in private gatherings that they should engage us only in the discussion if god exists or not so that we don't get a chance to do Direct Criticism upon Islam, Muhammad and Islamic Sharia. 

It is almost impossible for Islamic apologists to answer the direct criticism of Islam/Sharia in the light of humanity and modern science. Whether it is Islamic Slavery, oppression against women, rape of minor girls in the name of marriage, or scientific mistakes in the Quran and Hadith, then the religious god (i.e. Allah) is immediately EXPOSED. 

Therefore, please don't get into the trap of Islamic preachers, and don't indulge in an unnecessary debate about the existence of god, but target and criticize Islam, Muhammad and Sharia directly in the first step and prove them wrong. 


 

A Dialogue with a Muslim preacher:

A Muslim preacher came up with this argument:

I am ready to become an atheist if atheists could answer these questions (1) Where the matter came from (2) How the life began in that matter?

Response:

The existence of a " Religious God" is the real issue between atheists and Muslims, not the origins of matter or life. When we see scientific errors in the Quran or Islam promoting tyranny, it suggests that Allah doesn't exist and Muhammad fabricated revelations.

Discussing the source of matter is an internal debate among atheists, agnostics, and deists. More crucially, the existence of any deity is a secondary concern for them since they agree that no god intervenes in earthly affairs. As a result, they create systems based on reason rather than faith.

Unlike believers of various religions who fight and kill each other over their beliefs, atheists, agnostics, and deists do not engage in such violence. You never hear that any atheist has killed any agnostic person, by blaming him to be misguided. 

In simple terms, you don't need to become an atheist to leave Islam, nor do you need answers to questions like where matter came from or how life began. However, if it's proven that your religious god makes scientific blunders and goes against humanity, that's enough reason to leave Islam.

It is not important that Muslims become atheists, but only important thing is this that they get rid of Islam.

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →