There is a crucial distinction often missed in debates about the hijab, i.e., the freedom of an adult woman is not the same as the freedom of a child. While some Muslim girls may genuinely want to wear the hijab, many others wear it due to intense parental, community, or religious pressure. A young girl often lacks the practical ability to say "no" without fearing punishment, shame, or familial rejection. Therefore, this issue must be framed primarily as a matter of child protection and autonomy, rather than simply religious freedom.
The Precedent of Limiting Parental Authority:
Society already accepts that children are vulnerable to coercion and that parents do not have unlimited authority over them in the name of religion or culture.
- We restrict child labour even if a child "consents" to help their family.
- We enforce compulsory education even if a child and their parents object.
- We ban child marriage regardless of a 14-year-old's consent.
In all these cases, the state intervenes to protect the child’s future independence. Why should religious clothing be exempt from this principle?
The Challenge of Coercion:
It is nearly impossible for a school or society to distinguish a child's genuine choice from one produced by years of religious conditioning and fear. More importantly, what about the girl who desperately wants to remove the hijab but cannot safely do so?
A temporary ban in schools protects these vulnerable children until they reach an age where they possess the independence to make truly autonomous decisions. It prevents religious authority from becoming parental coercion.
A Necessary Sacrifice to Protect the Vulnerable:
For the girls who do genuinely want to wear the hijab, this law requires a difficult but necessary conversation.
But these girls (who want to wear the hijab on their own) should be made to understand that they are being asked to make a temporary sacrifice. By agreeing not to wear it in school, they are actively protecting their peers who are being forced to wear it against their will.
Without a universal, blanket rule, it becomes practically impossible to identify and stop the abuse of coerced girls, as coercive parents would simply claim their child "chose" it.
This "sacrifice" is the similar as in case of "child labour." There are some who genuinely want to work, but there are others who may be coerced in doing it. So, in order to save the coerced ones, a blanket rule was made which bans child labour universally.
Unfortunately, our world is not 100% perfect. We often have to make many "compromises" in order to survive in this non-perfect world.
Protect the Child, Preserve the Adult's Freedom:
This is not an attack on religious freedom; it is a boundary on parental control. Freedom of religion does not mean parents have unlimited authority over minors.
An adult Muslim woman must be completely free to choose whether or not to wear the hijab. But childhood is a time for developing independence, free from religious mandates imposed by adults. A girl who reaches adulthood and freely chooses to wear the hijab should be free to do so, and a girl who decides she does not want it should be equally free to remove it.
Hassan Radwan