Early Jewish and Christian beliefs held that the earth was flat. This was an old and outdated idea found in many places in the Bible. But in contrast, Greek scientists had proven centuries earlier that the earth was a sphere, and the real scientific reasons for the moon's phases had also been discovered. By the time of Muhammad, this knowledge was about 900 years old (link).

This was the contradiction that had been going on for centuries between science and the Bible. The Bible said the earth was flat, while scientists had presented a model that was the exact opposite.

That's why the Jews came to Muhammad and asked him about the reason for the moon's phases, because he claimed to be a divine messenger. The Jews thought that maybe Muhammad's Allah would answer and prove those scientists wrong.

But what happened?

What happened was that Allah was so unable that he couldn't even understand the Jews' question, so how could he possibly give an answer?

Allah's response in the Quran is still there today as proof:

(Quran 2:189): “They ask you about the phases of the moon. Say, “They are a means for people to determine time and pilgrimage."

Imam Qurtabi recorded the following tradition under this verse in his commentary (link):

هذا مما سأل عنه اليهود وٱعترضوا به على النبيّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فقال معاذ: يا رسول الله، إن اليهود تغشانا ويكثرون مسألتنا عن الأهِلة، فما بال الهلال يبدو دقيقاً ثم يزيد حتى يستوي ويستدير، ثم ينتقص حتى يعود كما كان؟ فأنزل الله هذه الآية.

This is what the Jews asked about and objected to the Prophet. So Muadh said: O Messenger of God, the Jews come to us and ask us about the crescents, so why does the crescent appear thin, then increases until it becomes even and round, then decreases until it returns as it was? Upon that, Allah revealed this verse.

This answer actually shows the Quran's lack of knowledge on three levels:

First level: Acknowledging ignorance

If the Quran had just said, "This question is not in my domain," at least that would have been the truth. But for a God to admit that he doesn't have knowledge takes him outside the definition of a God, and such a God is no longer a God.

Second level: Trying to hide ignorance

The Quran gave a completely irrelevant answer, like a child who doesn't understand a question and gives a random answer to hide his "ignorance." This behaviour shows not just a lack of knowledge, but also dishonesty.

Third level: Not understanding the question at all

This is the most pathetic situation. The Jews asked a question of a scientific nature, and the answer was only about a religious calendar. It's as if God couldn't understand the question or give an answer. This is the lowest level of ignorance.

Now look at this:

  • This answer is not scientific at all.

  • The question was something else, while the answer was something else.

  • And what the Quran said (that people look at the moon for worship) was already known to the Jews and all other people.

So this answer didn't add any knowledge for the people who asked the question, but only created disappointment.

Now, the thing to think about is that when the Jews came to Muhammad and asked, "What is the reason for the moon's phases?" it was a golden opportunity. If Muhammad was really Allah's prophet, he should have given the scientific truth to prove that the revelation came from the sky.

But the Quran's answer was extremely shallow and disappointing. The Quran didn't give any new revelation or confirm science. In fact, Muhammad's knowledge was even more limited than the Jews' because he belonged to the ignorant society of Arabs where astronomy and science did not exist.

This was the moment when the Quran should have shown scientific superiority, but the truth is that the Quran only showed "silence and ignorance". The result is that even today, Muslims present this answer as a miracle, while the world can clearly see that it was a failed attempt.

Is it possible that a book that is called the "Final Revelation of Allah" cannot answer a question that was already solved 900 years ago by scientists of that time, and which even the religious Jews were in great doubt about? If this book is really divine, then where did this ignorance come from?

After seeing this unscientific and irrelevant Quranic answer, and the inability to even understand the question, was it possible for the Jews to believe in Muhammad's prophethood?


The Greek astronomer "Aristarchus" came, whose time was 750 years before Islam. He was so good at astronomy that he not only knew that the moon and sun were spheres but also found out their sizes by using their shadows on the earth. You can read the full details in this link about how he did these calculations by using the half size of the moon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Sizes_and_Distances_(Aristarchus)


Half Moon

Aristarchus began with the premise that, during a half moon, the moon forms a right triangle with the Sun and Earth. By observing the angle between the Sun and Moon, φ, the ratio of the distances to the Sun and Moon could be deduced using a form of trigonometry.

AristarchusHalfLitMoon2.png

Lunar eclipse

Aristarchus then used another construction based on a lunar eclipse:

AristarchusLunar Eclipse2.png

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →