Today, social media is full where Muslims are blaming other Muslims for being Dayouth, while they allow their wives to appear and make videos on social media (even if their wives are wearing the full Hijab with Niqab).
But do you know that Islam transformed ALL millions of Male Slaves into Dayooth (Cuckolds). If their masters developed an interest in their slave wives, Islam permitted the masters to claim the slave wives for themselves. Subsequently, after engaging in intimate relationships with them, the masters returned those slave wives to their slave husbands.
Sahih Bukhari, [Chapter: "Forbidden to you (for marriage) are: your mothers, your daughters..."]:
وَقَالَ أَنَسٌ: {وَالْمُحْصَنَاتُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ} ذَوَاتُ الأَزْوَاجِ الْحَرَائِرُ حَرَامٌ إِلاَّ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ لاَ يَرَى بَأْسًا أَنْ يَنْزِعَ الرَّجُلُ جَارِيَتَهُ مِنْ عَبْدِهِ.
Anas said: The meaning of the Quranic verse: {وَالْمُحْصَنَاتُ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ} Married free women are forbidden to you except your married slave women that your right hands possess. But there is no problem if a man (i.e. the owner) takes his (married) female slave (for himself) from his male slave.
This means that all married women are forbidden, but if a female slave of any person is married to a male slave, then it is not forbidden for the owner to separate the married female slave from her husband, and take her for himself.
Unbelievable!
We also request all of our readers to please read this very important article to see more so-called Divine Morals of Islam:
Swapping of slave girls is also Halal Allah (permissible)
The evil of "Temporary" sexual relationships with slave girls in Islam also led to another evil, where the swapping of slave girls also became Halal Allah. If a Muslim man got lust for a slave girl of another person, he can simply offer that other man to swap their slave girls for rape.
Tafsir-e-Mazhari is a commentary of the Quran, which is taught in every Hanafi school. It is written under the commentary of verse 33:52 (Link):
Ibn Zayd said about this verse {وَلَآ أَن تَبَدَّلَ بِهِنَّ مِنْ أَزْوَٰجٍ nor to exchange your present wives for other women (Verse 33:52)} that people used to swap their wives during the era of ignorance ... upon that Allah revealed this verse and the swapping of wives is thus not allowed. But the slave women are not included in it, and you can swapp them and there is no issue in it.
Muhammad also instructed his companion to keep on enjoying his beautiful wife, even if she committed adultery
- Muhammad instructed one of his companions to keep on enjoying his beautiful wife, even if she committed adultery.
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: A man came to the Prophet (ﷺ), and said: My wife does not prevent the hand of a man who touches her (i.e. who fornicates with her). He said: Divorce her. He then said: I am afraid my inner self may covet her. He said: Then (keep) enjoying her (as your wife).
Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani)
Except for Ibn 'Abbas, this same hadith has also been narrated by Hisham (the slave of Muhammad) and companion Jabir bin Abdullah (جابر بن عبدالله).
Ibn Kathir recorded it from Hisham and Jabir bin Abdullah Ansari (link):
ومنهم هشام مولى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال محمد بن سعد: أنبأنا سليمان بن عبيد الله الرقي، أنبأنا محمد بن أيوب الرقي، عن سفيان، عن عبد الكريم، عن أبي الزبير عن هشام مولى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم. قال: جاء رجل فقال يا رسول الله إن امرأتي لا تدفع يد لامس، قال " طلقها " قال: إنها تعجبني، قال " فتمتع بها " قال ابن منده وقد رواه جماعة عن سفيان الثوري، عن أبي الزبير، عن مولى بني هاشم عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ولم يسمه. ورواه عبيد الله بن عمرو عن عبد الكريم عن أبي الزبير عن جابر.
" A man came and said, 'O Messenger of Allah, my wife does not repel my touch.' He said, 'Divorce her.' The man said, 'But I love her.' He said, 'Then enjoy her.'
Note: In this hadith, the phrase "يَدَ لاَمِسٍ" is used, which literally means "to touch." However, according to Arabic language usage, it carries the meaning of "to engage in sexual intercourse". The same term "to touch" has been employed with the same connotation of "engaging in sexual intercourse" in the Quran itself.
Quran 2:237:
وَإِن طَلَّقْتُمُوهُنَّ مِن قَبْلِ أَن تَمَسُّوهُنَّ وَقَدْ فَرَضْتُمْ لَهُنَّ فَرِيضَةً فَنِصْفُ مَا فَرَضْتُمْ
And if ye divorce them before touching them (i.e. doing intercourse), but after the fixation of a dower for them, then the half of the dower (Is due to them)
All Muslim Scholars are unanimous that “touching” here means to engage in sexual intercourse.
For example, Ibn Kathir writes in the commentary under this verse 2:237, that it means "penetration دخول" (link):
هذه الآية الكريمة مما يدل على اختصاص المتعة بما دلت عليه الآية الأولى، حيث إنما أوجب في هذه الآية نصف المهر المفروض إذا طلق الزوج قبل الدخول
This Ayah (2:237) requires the husband to relinquish half of the appointed Mahr if he divorces his wife before the penetration (الدخول) i.e. before the marriage is consummated.
Are you able to see the contradiction where, on one hand, there is a draconian punishment of 'stoning till death' by Islamic Sharia if a married woman engages in sex? But on the other hand, if she is beautiful, then this same Islamic Sharia is teaching to keep enjoying her only for your lust.
During the incident of IFK, three companions testified against 'Aisha's character. However, Muhammad desired to clear 'Aisha of the accusation, as it indirectly challenged his claim of prophethood. Consequently, he claimed the revelation of the following verses, which were intended to serve as evidence of 'Aisha's innocence.
Quran 24:3:
ٱلزَّانِى لَا يَنكِحُ إِلَّا زَانِيَةً أَوْ مُشْرِكَةً وَٱلزَّانِيَةُ لَا يَنكِحُهَآ إِلَّا زَانٍ أَوْ مُشْرِكٌ
The fornicator does not marry except a [female] fornicator or polytheist, and none marries her except a fornicator or a polytheist
Quran 24:26:
ٱلْخَبِيثَٰتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَٱلْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَٰتِ ۖ وَٱلطَّيِّبَٰتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَٱلطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَٰتِ أُو۟لَٰٓئِكَ مُبَرَّءُونَ مِمَّا يَقُولُونَ
Impure women are for impure men and impure men for impure women, and pure women are for pure men and pure men for pure women. They are free from those scandals which the slanderers utter.
However, in instructing his companions to continue deriving sexual pleasure from his beautiful wife, Muhammad seemingly overlooked the fact that during the incident of IFK, he had already declared that pure men are meant for pure women.
It is important to note that this occurrence proves that there exists no Allah in the heavens, and Muhammad, being human, made this mistake due to forgetfulness.
Dear Muslims!
It is now up to you to decide whether a religion with such significant contradictions can truly originate from a divine being in the heavens.
Hassan Radwan
