Muslim preachers are propagating that:
Women engaging in anal intercourse were 50 percent more likely than their peers to report having fecal incontinence at least once a month. The men’s odds of incontinence were almost tripled.
But the latest scientific studies suggest differently:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5231615/
RESULTS
Overall, 4,170 adults aged 20–69 years (2,070 women and 2,100 men) completed sexual behavior questionnaires and responded to fecal incontinence questions. Anal intercourse was higher among women (37.3%) than men (4.5%), P<0.001. Fecal incontinence rates were higher among women (9.9 vs. 7.4%, P=0.05) and men (11.6 vs. 5.3%, P=0.03) reporting anal intercourse compared with those not reporting anal intercourse.
Therefore:
- 7.4% of women get fecal incontinence even if they don't indulge in anal sex
- And if they do indulge in anal sex, then it increases from 7.4% to 9.9% (which is not 50% more as Muslim preachers are propagating).
- And 5.3% men also have it even without anal sex. And it increases to 11.6% (which is not 3 times increase).
Moreover, please also remember that these results are not for any chronic fecal incontinence disease, but of mild issue as Fecal incontinence was defined as the loss of liquid, solid, or mucus stool occurring at least ONCE a Month.
Anal Sex VS Obesity/Diabetes:
Obesity kills 4.4 million people (8% of total death in the world) per year. But still Islam has not declared it Haram that fat people will not be given food, or they must be put on obligatory fasting and dieting, or they should be forced to do exercise. The same is the case with Diabetes, which also kills millions of people every year. But still the SUGAR is not declared as Haram despite bringing so many diseases and deaths.
As compared to Obesity/Diabetes, the issue of anal sex is almost negligible.
Moreover, every kind of sexual activity (even among heterosexuals through vagina) comes with some dangers of sexually transmitted diseases.
Muslims, throughout of their history, were having multiple wives.
Moreover, Muslims also had dozens of slave women. And they were involved in TEMPORARY sexual relationship with them. This means, after raping and fulfilling their lusts, the Muslim master used to handover his slave-girl to his brother, or slave so that they may also rape her. Or he sold her to a 2nd master, who again raped her and then sold her to a 3rd master ... and thus this chain of rape by multiple Muslim men continued for slave-girls.
Compared to dangers from sexually transmitted diseases from having multiple wives and multiple slave-women in a temporary sexual relationship, the risk involved in anal sex is negligible.
Conclusion:
The problem is, Muslims consider that the NATURE is 100% PERFECT, while it has been made by their 100% PERFECT Allah.
While we tell them that the actions of Nature are not necessarily 100% perfect for humans. Nature does not care for humans. All of its actions come with risk for humankind. Not all mutations are good for humans. Some have less risk, while others have more risk. And we have to adopt, and we have to learn to survive.
EXTREME dangers and damages to 9 years old Mothers and their babies (Is Data Islamophobic?)
Western system tells everyone about the risks involved in sex (including anal sex). It is then the person's own CHOICE if he/she wants to involve in sex (including anal sex) or not.
Nevertheless, poor small girls had No Choice, as Islam allowed their fathers/guardians to wed them even without their consent. Abu Bakr didn't ask for any consent from 'Aisha at the age of 6 years when she was married.
Thus, those 9 years old brides had no choice. They were wed and they were FORCED to give birth to babies at that age. Now, let us look at the extreme dangers and harms to 9 years old mothers and their babies:
1.Science says 25-30 is the age of least risk to mother and child for a first pregnancy:
https://www.pnas.org/content/113/19/5227
"With the onset of puberty, the female developmental trajectory diverges substantially from the childhood trajectory, whereas the male trajectory essentially continues its earlier course (Table S2). As a result, the female pelvis attains its obstetrically most favorable morphology around the age of 25–30 y, i.e., at the age of highest fertility"
2.. The younger the mother, the greater the risk. Childbearing in adolescents aged 12–15 years in low resource countries: a neglected issue. New estimates from demographic and household surveys in 42 countries:
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01467.x
"It is frequently cited that girls who give birth aged 15–19 are more than twice as likely to die as those in their 20s (1, 2). However, this fails to capture the fact that risk increases with decreasing age. ......girls aged 15 or under had an odds ratio for maternal death four times higher than women aged 20–24. "
3. It is not just mortality, it's fistulas. Science says it is a problem:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877393/
"In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, obstetric fistula is very common, as access to and use of emergency obstetric care is limited ...... Several factors have been linked to the high occurrence of obstetric fistula in sub-Saharan Africa, including the preponderance of early marriage and teenage pregnancy, which in turn mean that the girls do not have pelvises which have sufficiently developed to allow reproduction [10]. This is further compounded by the poor nutritional status of most of the girls who live in these highly deprived settings [11,12]."
4. Aid-workers confirm death and fistulas are the problem:
https://www.livescience.com/19584-10-year-birth.html
"The greatest danger, however, is to the pelvic floor. Girls may start ovulating and menstruating as early as age 9, though the average is around 12 to 13. ........ Just because a girl can get pregnant, though, doesn't mean she can safely deliver a baby. The pelvis does not fully widen until the late teens, meaning that young girls may not be able to push the baby through the birth canal. The results are horrific, said Wall and Thomas, who have both worked in Africa treating women in the aftermath of such labors. Girls may labor for days; many die. Their babies often don't survive labor either.
The women and girls who do survive often develop fistulas, which are holes between the vaginal wall and the rectum or bladder. When the baby's head pushes down and gets stuck, it can cut portions of the mother's soft tissue between its skull and her pelvic bones. As a result, the tissue dies, and a hole forms. Feces and urine then leak through the hole and out of the vagina. Women with fistulas are often divorced and shunned. And young girls are at higher risk."
5. High mortality rate among the children from teen mothers is not the only problem, but they suffer with other horrific health problems too, the whole of their lives.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_pregnancy#Child
- Early motherhood can affect the psychosocial development of the infant. The children of teen mothers are more likely to be born prematurely with a low birth weight, predisposing them to many other lifelong conditions.[32]
- Children of teen mothers are at higher risk of intellectual, language, and socio-emotional delays.[30]
- Developmental disabilities and behavioral issues are increased in children born to teen mothers.[33][34]
- One study suggested that adolescent mothers are less likely to stimulate their infant through affectionate behaviors such as touch, smiling, and verbal communication, or to be sensitive and accepting toward their needs.[33]
- Poor academic performance in the children of teenage mothers has also been noted, with many of the children being held back a grade level, scoring lower on standardized tests, and/or failing to graduate from secondary school.[26]
- Sons born to teenage mothers are three times more likely to serve time in prison.[37]
Is all this Data Islamophobic?
Hassan Radwan