The Issue of Trans Women in Women’s Prisons

Court Blocks Trump’s Order to Send Transgender Women to Male Prisons

It’s deeply unfortunate that far-right religious groups have undermined the rights of vulnerable transgender individuals. Equally concerning is that supporting transgender rights has become politically sensitive, potentially harming advocates. However, standing for justice shouldn’t be about short-term political gain. Protecting transgender people remains the right thing to do, regardless of the cost.

While the battle continues, a major step forward occurred when courts blocked Trump’s directive to force transgender women into male prisons (Reuters).

The ruling was based on several key points:

1. Transgender Women Face Extreme Harm in Male Prisons: Government reports and legal rulings, including Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994), confirm transgender individuals suffer significantly higher rates of physical and sexual violence when housed in prisons matching their biological sex rather than their gender identity. People are raped, assaulted, and even killed for being trans. The Trump administration’s legal team didn’t challenge this in court, conceding both the legal and moral argument.
2. Right-Wing Arguments Rely on Rare Cases: Critics argue that transgender women with a history of sexual offenses might pose a risk to female inmates. While isolated cases exist, they are extremely rare compared to the widespread violence transgender women face in male prisons. The harm of placing transgender women in male facilities far outweighs the risk posed by these few cases.

Trans women, unlike cisgender men, undergo hormone therapy and take testosterone blockers, significantly reducing muscle mass and physical strength. This makes their strength levels closer to cisgender women than cis men. Placing trans women in men’s prisons leaves them defenseless against the physical aggression of cisgender male inmates, many with violent histories. In prisons, where physical dominance often dictates survival, trans women lack the biological advantages of cis men and are highly vulnerable.

Human rights advocates argue that trans women should be housed in women’s facilities. Ignoring these biological and medical realities leads to increased violence, assault, psychological trauma, and even death for trans inmates.

Perfection Is Not Possible, but Solutions Exist

No perfect solution exists in an imperfect world. We face challenges and must make compromises to coexist. Yet, far-right religious groups demand an unrealistic, absolute solution—denying transgender existence entirely. This refusal deepens transgender suffering, pushing many toward distress and suicide.

A practical approach requires compromise. Possible solutions include:

1. Dedicated transgender prison facilities: Costly and logistically challenging.
2. Placing trans women in male prisons: Proven highly dangerous.
3. Placing trans women in female prisons: With careful monitoring, transferring offenders to solitary confinement or male facilities if needed—this was the policy before Trump’s orders.

Even without physical assault, forcing trans women to live as men in male prisons—using male pronouns, wearing male clothing, and enduring male searches—causes severe psychological harm. Government reports and psychiatric studies confirm this distress leads to significant mental health issues. The Trump administration’s lawyers didn’t contest these findings in court, marking another legal and moral defeat for those seeking to erase transgender identities.

The far-right’s refusal to accept scientific reality worsens transgender suffering. While risks exist with any policy, the solution shouldn’t be to erase an entire group’s rights. History shows progress is slow, but justice prevails.

The religious right’s approach reveals contradictions and ideological motives:

1. Selective Concern for Sexual Violence: They focus on protecting cisgender women from sexual violence (important) but ignore widespread same-sex assaults, especially in men’s prisons.
2. Deliberate Harm to Trans People: They know their policies cause suffering for trans individuals but view this as intentional and desirable, aiming to erase trans people from public life.
3. Mocking and Dehumanizing Trans People: Rather than acknowledging trans suffering, they trivialize and mock it, joking about abuse faced by trans individuals.
4. Threat to Patriarchal Beliefs: Trans people challenge gender norms seen as divinely ordained, viewed as a direct challenge to “God’s plan.”
5. Fear of Losing Control: Conservatives fear that allowing self-defined identities undermines religious authority, believing strict gender roles are civilization’s foundation.

Far-Right Argument: Reform Male Prisons Instead

A common far-right argument is: “Why not reform male prisons instead of transferring trans women to women’s prisons?”

Our Response: While prison reform is crucial, it’s a separate issue from the immediate need to minimize harm to transgender individuals in the current system. Reforming male prisons is a long-term goal, but it doesn’t address the urgent risks trans women face in male facilities today. We must prioritize their safety within the existing framework while advocating for broader changes.

Scandinavian countries, like Norway and Finland, have implemented mixed prisons, such as Norway’s Halden, designed to simulate a village environment. These “open prisons” promote normalcy and rehabilitation, with research showing positive outcomes (Centre for Economic Policy Research). For violent offenders, separate wings or confinement may be needed, but for non-violent inmates, unisex systems could be more humane.