Can Women's Sports Stay Competitive with Trans Women Athletes?

We live in an imperfect world, requiring "COMPROMISES" to find workable solutions. No solution will be flawless, but we must balance fairness and inclusion.

So, what’s the solution?

• Option 1: Separate Sports Categories for Trans Women: Creating separate categories for transgender women sounds inclusive, but is impractical. The costs and logistics of new categories are prohibitive, and it risks isolating trans athletes, deepening division in an already fragmented world.

• Option 2: Trans Women Competing with Men: Forcing trans women to compete in men’s categories ignores the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), which lowers testosterone and muscle mass, aligning them with cisgender women. This puts trans women at a physical disadvantage and undermines their identity, causing emotional harm. It’s neither fair nor humane.

• Option 3: Trans Women Competing with Cisgender Women: This option, while imperfect, is the most balanced. Trans women on HRT have testosterone and muscle mass comparable to cisgender women. Evidence shows they don’t dominate sports, and media often exaggerates their wins while ignoring losses. This approach balances inclusivity and fairness, giving everyone a fair shot.

Some Cis Women Athletes have higher Testosterone and Muscles Levels than Trans Women on Hormone Therapy

It is very important to understand that transgender athletes on HRT (Hormone Replace Therapy) undergo physical changes that diminish pre-transition advantages. For trans women, HRT reduces muscle mass and strength, aligning their athletic potential with cisgender women.

It is again very important to understand that even some cis women athletes have higher testosterone and muscle mass than trans women on HRT. So, if cis women with naturally higher testosterone and muscle mass than trans women are allowed to compete, why exclude trans women with lower levels?

Huge Variations Among Cisgender Athletes, Where Compromises Were Made

Moreover, consider these issues:

1. Some human populations are naturally shorter or lighter, others taller or heavier. Despite this, we allow all to compete, even if shorter athletes face disadvantages.
2. Within populations, individuals vary in height, strength, or speed. This natural variation doesn’t disqualify anyone—it’s part of sports’ diversity.

A study, Sex differences and athletic performance by D.J. Oberlin (link), concludes that athletic excellence isn’t solely determined by sex. Genetic and hormonal variations allow some individuals to excel, regardless of gender identity. Key findings:

• About 2.3% of people naturally excel in sports due to genetic gifts—height, strength, or speed—regardless of gender.
• Only 0.5–0.6% of the population is transgender. The idea of cis men pretending to be trans women to dominate sports is unfounded.
• HRT eliminates many physical differences from puberty, levelling the field for trans women.
• If trans women excel, it’s likely due to natural variability, like athletes with unique physical traits.

What About Cis Women with High Testosterone?

Consider cisgender women like Imane Khelif, who naturally have higher testosterone levels. Should they:

• Compete against cis men?
• Have their own category?
• Be banned from sports?

Athletic performance varies widely among cisgender athletes. Why single out trans women when natural variation is part of sports? If we police testosterone, where’s the line? Should we ban Michael Phelps for producing less lactic acid, giving him a swimming edge? The fixation on trans athletes is disproportionate.

Will Women's Sports Stay COMPETITIVE if Trans Women Compete?

Can Women's Sports Still Be Competitive with Trans Women Playing?

Short answer?

Yes, definitely.

Think about it:

In every sport, some women are naturally taller, faster, or stronger than others. That’s just how human bodies work. Some cis women even have higher hormones and muscle mass than trans women who’ve been on HRT.
But nobody says, "Hey, that’s unfair, ban them!"

If women’s sports stay competitive with all this natural variation, letting a few trans women compete won’t change that. It’s still about hard work, training, and talent, like it’s always been.

Only 10 Trans Athletes in NCAA

In December, the NCAA president told Congress there are “less than 10” transgender athletes in the NCAA. Meanwhile, states with anti-trans laws saw a 72% increase in suicide attempts among trans kids, per an NPR story. We’re debating a handful of athletes while lives are at stake. Is hypothetical sports fairness worth the mental health and survival of trans youth?

“You know my child is dead,” Kentucky Senator Karen Berg said at the statehouse during a 2023 debate on an anti-trans bill. Her transgender son died by suicide at 24. “Your vote yes on this bill means one of two things: either you believe that trans children do not exist, or you believe that trans children do not deserve to exist.”

History: How Solutions Were Found to Include Women’s Sports in Olympics

The Olympic Games began in Ancient Greece around 776 BCE in Olympia, exclusively for men. Women were banned from competing and, if married, from watching. Sports were seen as a male domain, with women deemed irrelevant.

Despite this, women participated in the Heraean Games, competing in foot races dedicated to Hera. These events lacked the prestige of men’s Olympics.

The modern Olympics, revived in 1896 by Pierre de Coubertin, initially banned women, arguing sports were too demanding and their inclusion would disrupt tradition. This mirrors arguments against transgender women today—both challenge established norms.

Women competed in the 1900 Paris Olympics, but only in “suitable” events like tennis and golf. Over time, more sports opened to women as society embraced inclusivity, creating separate categories and securing funding. Women’s inclusion evolved through compromises, proving sports can adapt. The same process can apply to transgender athletes, ensuring fair, inclusive competition.