One of the most used arguments by Islamists, is:

If the prophet allegedly created Allah (like what non-Muslims claim), why did then he spend nights praying and seeking forgiveness from the very deity he supposedly created?

Response:

A proof should be open and clear. For example, both the Meccan pagans and the Jews constantly asked Muhammad to show any miracle as proof of his prophethood. But both Muhammad and Allah were unable to show any miracle, and then Quran had to present several excuses for this inability to show any miracle. Please read our article: The Quranic Excuses for Muhammad's Inability to perform any Miracle

Thus, Muhammad's worshipping Allah cannot be used as proof of Muhammad's prophethood, as there could be many hidden reasons for this.

For example, one possible reason could be, Muhammad's primary weapon to make people believe in his prophethood was making them FEARFUL of Allah. And once they believe in him, then he also has to “maintain” this status to get worldly benefits. And in order to maintain it, he has to show that he was himself fearful of Allah, and he was worshipping him. 

Another possible reason could be that Muhammad believed in stories of the Bible and divine punishments.

Muhammad knowingly pretended to be a prophet to gain personal advantages, but deep down he believed in the existence of a higher power who created him. He feared this divine being for deceiving people in his name.

This fear became evident when natural phenomena like solar eclipses or earthquakes occurred. During such events, Muhammad grew extremely anxious, worried that the real God might begin to punish him for fabricating a false god and falsely claiming prophethood. As a result, he would drop everything and devote himself to worship.

Similarly, in the Islamic story of Pharaoh, even though Pharaoh claimed to be a god, he also feared Allah, realizing that he was not a true deity. So when Moses warned him about impending divine punishment, Pharaoh would prostrate and beg for forgiveness from Moses' God. And due to this act of asking forgiveness by Pharaoh, Allah postponed the punishment many times.

This story of Pharaoh and many plagues in Egypt was first appeared in the Bible (Exodus). But every time Pharaoh asked for forgiveness, and the divine punishment of different plagues disappeared due to asking for forgiveness. 

Muhammad copied this story of plagues from the Bible in the Quran 7:134-135. 

Thus, knowing himself that he was only deceiving people in the name of real God, Muhammad became extremely fearful whenever any natural disaster occurred (while according to other stories of the Bible, natural disasters were the way that God punished people for their sins). 

Sahih Muslim 912: 

The sun eclipsed during the time of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). He stood in great anxiety fearing that it might be the Doomsday, till he came to the mosque. He stood up to pray with prolonged qiyam, ruku', and prostration which I never saw him doing in prayer; and then he said: These are the signs which Allah sends, not on account of the death of anyone or life of any one, but Allah sends them to frighten thereby His servants. So when you see any such thing, hasten to remember Him, supplicate Him and beg pardon from Him

Sahih al-Bukhari 1034:

Whenever a strong wind blew, anxiety appeared on the face of the Prophet (fearing that wind might be a sign of Allah's wrath).

Sahih Muslim 899c:

'A'isha, the wife of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), reported: I never saw Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) laugh to such an extent that I could see his uvula-whereas he used to smile only-and when he saw dark clouds or wind, (the signs of fear) were depicted on his face. I said: Messenger of Allah, I find people being happy when they ace the dark cloud in the hope that it would bring rain, but I find that when you see that (the cloud) there is an anxiety on your face. He said: 'A'isha, I am afraid that there may be a calamity in it, for a people was afflicted with wind

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →