Please be aware!!!

Whenever religious Muslims get the power, and they succeed in establishing an Islamic Caliphate, then it will become obligatory for them to wage “Jihad” against all the non-Islamic States.

And as soon as “Jihad” revives, then “Islamic Slavery” will also revive automatically along with it (as the captive women and children of the non-Muslims will be made slaves after the war)

You will find this same ruling, in the fatwa of Saudi Grand Mufti Sheikh Saleh al-Fawzan, who is openly declaring that institutions of Jihad and Slavery will revive automatically with the establishment of an Islamic Caliphate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saleh_Al-Fawzan
In the tape he was quoted as saying, “Slavery is a part of Islam ... Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is Islam.” As for the modernist interpretation that Islam totally abolished slavery, he dismissed its exponents saying, “They are ignorant, not scholars. ... Whoever says such things is an infidel.”

 

Slavery in modern times by ISIS … Who is responsible?

There is one thing “Problem”.

While another thing is the “Mother of all Problems”, which is actually responsible for all the other secondary problems.

ISIS took the Yazidi captive women as slave women. Muslims blame it upon ISIS. But the question is if really ISIS was the only one responsible for this crime?

No, ISIS was not the only one responsible, but this problem also arose from the Religion of Islam, which acted as the “mother of all problems”.

ISIS openly claim that all those Muslims who say that slavery is illegal, then all these Muslims have become Kafirs, while they are declaring the Halal of Allah (i.e. slavery) as Haram on their own.

It is not ISIS, but the writer of the Quran himself, who claims that only Allah has the right to make the laws in Sharia, and no human is allowed to change these laws. And whoever does it, then he becomes a Kafir.

(Quran 5:44) لَّمْ يَحْكُم بِمَا أَنزَلَ اللّهُ فَأُوْلَـئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ
Whoso judgeth not by that which Allah hath revealed: such are disbelievers.

All Muslims are helpless in front of this argument of ISIS, and they have no answer.

Not a single movement by Muslims during the last 1400 years to end slavery

There were more than 200 major movements in Human History, which tried to abolish slavery. You can read the timeline of these movements here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_abolition_of_slavery_and_serfdom

But you will not find a single movement from Muslims (when they were in power) in this long list of movements against slavery.

It is said about Islam that it is not possible to “reform” this religion. And you can see the proof of this in the case of slavery, where not even a single movement was initiated by Muslims (while being in power) in order to end slavery.

Muhammad turned Muslims into Zombies. It is not allowed for these Zombies to change/reform any law of Sharia. Since slavery was made Halal by Allah, they believe that no human is allowed to make it Haram (prohibit) now.

When the non-religious West started the movement to end slavery on the global level, then Muslims were the people who opposed this movement the most.

 

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →