A question often posed by many religious individuals to atheists is: If you don't believe in religion, why don't you engage in illicit relations with your mothers and sisters? Do Muslims truly believe that they refrain from such actions due to the fear of religion? Today, these actions are condemned not because of religious teachings or moral principles, but because you fear the consequences of such actions in society. If Muslims indeed possess such a strong fear of God and are bound by religious obligations, then why do they indulge in bribery, corruption, hoarding, and illegal profiteering? Why do they engage in usury, which is warned against even more severely than the act of committing adultery with one's mother seventy times? Have you ever pondered upon this?

الربا ثلاثةٌ وسبعونَ بابًا ، وأيسرُها مثلُ أنْ ينكِحَ الرجلُ أمَّهُ 

The Prophet (ﷺ) said: "Usury has seventy-three categories, the least one in sin is as that of a man who marries (has sexual relations with) his mother

Grade: Sahih ( Albani)

Does religion and the fear of God not prevent you from these sins? Or can it not prevent you, for the simple reason that there hardly exist such thing as the fear of God? If you abstain from engaging in sexual relations with your mothers and sisters, it is not entirely due to the fear of God or religious prohibitions, but rather mainly because you are afraid of societal consequences and disgrace. It is not that you are forbidden by religion or societal norms to do so, but rather you refrain out of the fear that society will ostracize you, and even your parents will not accept you. In essence, it is not the fear of God that prevents you, but the fear of societal backlash and shame.

This is why individuals, regardless of their religious or atheistic beliefs, are deeply afraid of engaging in sexual activities with their mothers and sisters. This fear mainly stems from society's strong condemnation and potential infamy, not from the teachings of religion. However, religious individuals attempt to take credit even in this aspect, attributing their restraint to the fear of God, as though they would refrain from such actions even if they were alone at night with their young mothers or sisters. Compare this with the scenario of young women willing to lie down on a bed next to their young brothers in the privacy of their homes. Most likely, men would hesitate for even a minute, and then dismiss the fear of God. 

Even 'Google Trends' is also a witness to this sexual frustration

Pakistanis are at the top for the last 2 decades in search of incest terms like:

  1. Sister Rape: From 2006 to 2019, Pakistan consistently held the top position each year. (Note: Pakistani Government banned Pornographic Websites in 2011, But still this trend didn't end immediately. And still 'sister porn' was the most searched term on Google search from Pakistan till 2019. Please adjust the settings on "Google Trends" to see the report for each year from 2006 to 2019).
  2. Mother Rape: Pakistan was at the top every year from 2006 to 2012 (till a ban on pornographic websites by the Pakistani government). 
  3. Child Sex: Pakistan is at the top from 2006 till 2023 (and even the ban on the pornographic website didn't dethrone Pakistanis from searching for it).
  4. Donkey Rape: Pakistan is at the top from 2006 till 2023 (and even the ban didn't stop them from searching for it). 

(Note: Pornographic website Pornhub also publish its list of visitors from every country. But you will not see Pakistan on the list there, while the Pakistani Government has banned this website. And Pakistanis visit this website only through VPN)

This happens while Islamic society does not put you in prison or lash you for watching a porn film. Thus, fear of Allah alone is no hindrance for Muslim men for watching porn movies.

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →