The Quran's level of incoherence has left thousands of the most prominent Quranic commentators from the past 14 centuries grappling to comprehend it, yet they have been unable to fully do so.

One of the reasons for this confusion is the presence of verses revealed during the Meccan period within the Medinan Surahs, and vice versa. This intermingling makes it incredibly challenging for an ordinary person to discern which incident each verse refers to.

The disorderliness is not confined to the arrangement of Surahs alone; it extends even within individual verses. For instance, a single verse might begin discussing one event, then abruptly shift to another event that occurred years later, only to circle back and address the initial event in its third part. This internal disarray adds to the difficulty of comprehending the Quran's intended message (if it really has any). 

Look at this verse from the Quran:

(Quran 5:3) (1st part of the verse about the event 1) Forbidden to you is that which dies of itself, and blood, and flesh of swine, and that on which any other name than that of Allah has been invoked, and the strangled (animal) and that beaten to death, and that killed by a fall and that killed by being smitten with the horn, and that which wild beasts have eaten, except what you slaughter, and what is sacrificed on stones set up (for idols) and that you divide by the arrows; that is a transgression (2nd part of the verse about the event 2, which happened many years later) This day have those who disbelieve despaired of your religion, so fear them not, and fear Me. This day have I perfected for you your religion and completed My favor on you and chosen for you Islam as a religion; (3rd part of the verse, which again starts talking about the event 1) but whoever is compelled by hunger, not inclining willfully to sin, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

All Quranic commentators unanimously agree that this particular verse presents a unique case of discontinuity:

  • The first part of the verse pertains to Haram (prohibited) foods and was revealed during the 6th Hijri year, specifically during the Pact of Hudaybiyyah.
  • However, the 2nd (middle) part of the same verse unexpectedly shifts the topic to the "Perfection of Religion." This portion of the verse was revealed at a completely different time in the 10th Hijri year, approximately 81 days prior to the death of Muhammad. Interestingly, this section has no apparent connection to the preceding part of the verse.
  • Finally, the 3rd and last part of the verse (or sentence) circles back to address the initial incident concerning Haram foods. This part was also revealed during the event of the Pact of Hudaybiyyah in the 6th Hijri year.

Maulana Modoodi wrote in his commentary of the Quran under this verse:

“According to authentic traditions, this 2nd part of the verse (about the perfection of religion) was revealed at the time of “Last Sermon” in the 10th Hijri year. But the initial part of the verse was about the Pact of Hudaybiyyah (which happened in the 6th Hijri year).

Maulana Taqi Uthmani wrote in his commentary of the Quran under this verse:

Some Jews said to Umar Ibn Khattab, had this verse “This day have I perfected for you your religion” revealed upon them, then they would have taken it as a day of Eid (celebration). Upon that Umar told the Jews that they didn't know that two Eids of Muslims were combined on this day. This verse was revealed in the 10 th Hijri year at the incident of "Last Sermon" at the place of "Urfa" at the time of "Asr Prayer". There were 40 thousand companions with prophet Muhammad. And the holy prophet remained alive for 81 days after this incident.

Is there any other book besides the Quran that exhibits such a high level of incoherence?

Undoubtedly, even the Bible contains instances of incoherence, but it still surpasses the Quran in terms of clarity and comprehensibility. A regular person can read the Bible and understand it to a considerable extent. However, this is not the case with the Quran, as it remains profoundly challenging for an ordinary individual to grasp, despite the Quran's claims and the assertions of Muslims that Allah designed it to be easily understood.

The most remarkable miracle, in fact, lies in how billions of Muslims can consider such an incoherent book like the Quran to be a divine miracle.

Question: Why don't Muslims perceive these problems with the Quran?

Response: Consider the phenomenon of conformity seen in experiments, where a newcomer adopts the behavior of a group without necessarily understanding the reasons behind it. For instance, if the entire group starts clapping, the newcomer also begins clapping without any specific reason.

It is known as the Asch conformity experiment. People may follow the wrong trend just to keep up with a group.

 


External Link: The Truth About the Quran | Harvard Professor Shady Nasser

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →