According to Islamic apologists:

  • The best way to protect women is by covering them with a Hijab, and an even more effective approach is to keep them confined within the four walls of their homes, preventing them from going outside.
  • “Hunger for Sex” is a part of the 'nature' of men. Therefore, it is natural for them to become aroused after seeing a woman without a Hijab, or if they interact with them. A woman without Hijab becomes like an unwrapped candy that attracts flies. 

Response:

Absolutely, the key distinction is that a wrapped object lacks will, goals, dreams, and thoughts, while women possess these attributes. That's why no woman living in freedom would opt for the Hijab.

Moreover:

  • Muhammad prohibited slave women to take the HIjab 
  • And Muhammad also kept their breasts naked, as Islamic Sharia declared their 'Awrah (i.e. nakedness) from the navel to the knee.
  • There were thousands of slave women present in public with naked breasts during the era of Muhammad.
  • And they were sold in this same semi-naked state in the bazaars of Slavery, where customers not only looked at their naked bodies but were also allowed to personally touch and check their private parts too. 
  • And Umar Ibn Khattab used to beat those slave women, who even by mistake took the Hijab. 

Today, Muslims blame girls without hijabs to be immodest and prostitutes. But they are unable to see their own prophet and Sharia, which compelled millions of slave women to move in public without the Hijab and even with naked breasts. 

 Please read our article: Hijab is not a sign of Modesty, but a sign of Discrimination and inhuman Insult against the Slave Women

Overcoming sexual frustration through natural interaction

In contrast, the citizens of Tokyo are renowned for their honesty, returning lost belongings such as wallets, money, and mobile phones in exceptional numbers (link).

Non-religious Japan managed to control the "Hunger for Money," which is also a part of human nature. The country achieved this by providing ample employment opportunities for its citizens, ensuring they could earn enough for their needs and livelihoods. Additionally, Japan prioritized moral education from childhood, resulting in a society that has transcended greed and material desires. As a consequence, its citizens voluntarily return lost money to the police, reflecting the peak of humanity.

Likewise, it is a fundamental human right for women to move freely and fearlessly within society.

In the non-religious Western world, natural interaction between men and women was fostered, allowing them to better understand and respect each other, thus mitigating the risk of sexual frustration. As a result, women can move alone in society without fear, even during nighttime.

However, Islam strictly prohibits natural interaction between men and women, forbidding them from talking or understanding each other.

To build a civilized society, young boys should be taught to respect women, irrespective of their attire, and they should not be segregated from girls of their own age. Growing up together fosters mutual empathy, discouraging inappropriate behavior.

Unnatural restrictions imposed by Islam have led to a sexually frustrated society, making it challenging for girls to move freely and safely. In Pakistan, this frustration has resulted in incidents of sexual violence, such as the rape of children in Quran Schools (link) and even despicable acts of raping dead women's bodies, after taking them out of their graves (link).

If you want to keep society barbaric and wild and uncivilized, then please imprison the women in their houses. 

But if you want to make society educated and civilized, then put an end to these unnatural restrictions of religion, and instead of imprisoning the women in Burqa/Hijab and confining them to their homes, provide them with basic human rights, allowing them to breathe freely and live natural lives. . 

 

Conclusion:

Fundamentally, the morality in Quran and Sunnah is that a women's sexuality is a property of a man. When they say “protect women” they mean it in the same way as “protecting cattle from bandits”. The interest is in keeping the value of your property, not the well-being of the woman herself. That's why they see no issue with marital rape, or rape of slave women because that's their property, they are using their product, while somebody else raping your wife, then they are stealing your property.

 


Read it in Image Format

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →