Read this news:

Bangladesh closes breast milk bank after 'widespread criticism'

A Bangladesh hospital has suspended plans to give donated breast milk to babies after a backlash by Muslim clerics who said the scheme violated Islamic law.

And this one:

Pakistan’s first human milk bank temporarily suspended operations on Saturday following severe criticism from religious circles

Islamic scholars say that the initiative goes against the Islamic concept of “milk kinship” and creates problems for family law,

And this one:

Islamic Fatwa: Only Muslim mothers' milk will be provided to Muslim babies (i.e. even milk of animals like cow and goats is acceptible, but the milk of a non-Muslim mother is not acceptable in Islam). 

Remember:

  • Breastfeeding does not alter DNA.
  • Therefore, no genetic diseases will occur if so-called foster siblings marry each other.
  • They are actually more protected against genetic diseases compared to the cousin marriages common in Islam. Cousins share 12.5% common genes, but the so-called foster siblings share no common genes despite hundreds of times of breastfeeding the same woman. 
  • Additionally, no sibling bond develops among infants who drink the milk of the same woman. However, a significant sibling bond exists in cousin marriages among Muslims.

This concept (i.e. breastfeeding the milk of same woman make you siblings) originated from the traditions of Arab society during a time of ignorance, and Muhammad adhered to it without intervention from an All-Knowing Allah to correct the mistake.

It is worth reflecting on the similarity of this concept with certain aspects found in Hinduism, where cows are regarded as mothers due to drinking their milk, as described in their religious texts.

Why mother's Milk is the only option?

Pakistan is among the countries with the highest infant mortality rates. According to UNICEF statistics, 54 out of every 1,000 newborns die. Under the SDG goals, Pakistan has committed to reducing this rate to 12 per 1,000.

The World Health Organization recommends that all children be exclusively breastfed for the first six months and continue breastfeeding along with complementary foods up to the age of two years. Premature and low-birth-weight babies who are fed anything other than mother's milk face health complications and an increased risk of infections, which can lead to death. Therefore, it is crucial to provide mother's milk to save the lives of these newborns.

Muhammad adopted the practice of Milk Kinship from his Arab Pagan Culture

The Bible (Jews and Christians) or Magians, Hindus etc. didn't practice any milk kinship. But this concept was present in pre-Islam Arab culture of the time of ignorance. 

And Muhammad copied this practice from them. 

Remember, no changes occur in DNA due to breastfeeding the same woman (or due to drinking milk from the same cow). 

However, there are 12.5% common genes between first cousins, but Islam still allowed this incestuous marriage. 

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →