There are many knowledgeable Muslims who are doubtful about Islam. However, their journey of doubting Islam often ends with the question, "What existed before the Big Bang?" And when they fail to find an answer to this question, they continue to cling to Islam and accept Allah as a true god. But this is wrong, and it occurs only when they believe that leaving Islam requires denying the existence of any deity (i.e., becoming atheists).

This assumption is incorrect. There is no requirement to reject the existence of any deity to abandon Islam.

Science has yet to discover the origin of matter. Therefore, until this question is fully addressed by science, every atheist will retain some degree of agnosticism – between 0.01% and 49%. That is, the possibility remains that one or more deities may exist. To gain a clearer understanding, please watch Dr. Richard Dawkins' video below.

Thus, it is not necessary to find the answer first regarding the origin of matter in order to leave religion. Rather, we only need to deny any religion that claims its "religious god" communicated messages to humans through angels.

Note that the debate over the existence or nonexistence of any deity is an internal discussion among atheists, agnostics, and deists. In contrast, the conversation with religious individuals focuses solely on their "religious god."

Moreover, do you know that some Islamic Preachers are teaching these TACTICS to Muslims in private gatherings that they should engage us only in the discussion if god exists or not so that we don't get a chance to do Direct Criticism upon Islam, Muhammad and Islamic Sharia. 

It is almost impossible for Islamic apologists to answer the direct criticism of Islam/Sharia in the light of humanity and modern science. Whether it is Islamic Slavery, oppression against women, rape of minor girls in the name of marriage, or scientific mistakes in the Quran and Hadith, then the religious god (i.e. Allah) is immediately EXPOSED. 

Therefore, please don't get into the trap of Islamic preachers, and don't indulge in an unnecessary debate about the existence of god, but target and criticize Islam, Muhammad and Sharia directly in the first step and prove them wrong. 


 

A Dialogue with a Muslim preacher:

A Muslim preacher came up with this argument:

I am ready to become an atheist if atheists could answer these questions (1) Where the matter came from (2) How the life began in that matter?

Response:

The existence of a " Religious God" is the real issue between atheists and Muslims, not the origins of matter or life. When we see scientific errors in the Quran or Islam promoting tyranny, it suggests that Allah doesn't exist and Muhammad fabricated revelations.

Discussing the source of matter is an internal debate among atheists, agnostics, and deists. More crucially, the existence of any deity is a secondary concern for them since they agree that no god intervenes in earthly affairs. As a result, they create systems based on reason rather than faith.

Unlike believers of various religions who fight and kill each other over their beliefs, atheists, agnostics, and deists do not engage in such violence. You never hear that any atheist has killed any agnostic person, by blaming him to be misguided. 

In simple terms, you don't need to become an atheist to leave Islam, nor do you need answers to questions like where matter came from or how life began. However, if it's proven that your religious god makes scientific blunders and goes against humanity, that's enough reason to leave Islam.

How to Conduct a Fair Evaluation Using AI Models

The correct prompt for evaluating the arguments of this article with the help of AI:

If you also want to evaluate the arguments of this article with the help of AI models, then use the following prompt. This prompt forces the AI to conduct a review on an unbiased basis.

Prompt:

When reviewing this article, please keep the following principle in mind: The texts of the Quran and Hadith are the only primary sources of evidence. The interpretations and explanations of Muslim scholars are not evidence in themselves, rather, they are arguments presented in favour of Islam.  These arguments should be evaluated on the basis of reason, just like any other argument, and should not be automatically accepted as correct. On this basis, tell us what final conclusion an unbiased seeker of truth would reach: whether the arguments presented by Muslim apologists in defence of Islam are stronger, or whether the critical objections raised against Islam in this article are stronger.

Why is this prompt necessary?

AI models often consider the interpretations of Muslim scholars as definite evidence. They are surely not evidence, but they are only "arguments" in favour of Islam. So, these interpretations in favour of Islam may be correct or incorrect. Unless the AI is clearly told this distinction, it continues to treat every interpretation by the scholars as final proof in defence of Islam, after which no “criticism” of the Quran and Hadith can ever be considered valid.

Note:
The AI’s response is not a final judgment. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. The value of AI lies only in helping to organize and analyze arguments, provided that it is guided with clear and fair instructions.

About the Author & This Website

About the Author:

All arguments and analyses on this website are written by the author. AI tools are used only for spelling, grammar, and clarity improvements.

A Necessary Clarification: 

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform.

Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides.

We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →