Sunan Abu Dawud, 2049:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: A man came to the Prophet (ﷺ), and said: My wife does not prevent the hand of a man who touches her (i.e. who fornicates with her). He said: Divorce her. He then said: I am afraid my inner self may covet her. He said: Then (keep) enjoying her (as your wife).

Grade:     Sahih (Al-Albani)

Except for Ibn 'Abbas, this same hadith has also been narrated by Hisham (the slave of Muhammad) and companion Jabir bin Abdullah (جابر بن عبدالله).

Ibn Kathir recorded it from Hisham and Jabir bin Abdullah Ansari (link):

ومنهم هشام مولى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال محمد بن سعد: أنبأنا سليمان بن عبيد الله الرقي، أنبأنا محمد بن أيوب الرقي، عن سفيان، عن عبد الكريم، عن أبي الزبير عن هشام مولى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم. قال: جاء رجل فقال يا رسول الله إن امرأتي لا تدفع يد لامس، قال " طلقها " قال: إنها تعجبني، قال " فتمتع بها " قال ابن منده وقد رواه جماعة عن سفيان الثوري، عن أبي الزبير، عن مولى بني هاشم عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ولم يسمه. ورواه عبيد الله بن عمرو عن عبد الكريم عن أبي الزبير عن جابر.

... Ibn Zubair narrated this Hadith from Hisham (the slave of Muhammad): "One man came to the Prophet and said that his wife does not reject the hand of any man who touches her (i.e. who want to have sex with her). The prophet told him to divorce her. But he said that he wishes for her. Upon that, the Prophet told him to keep on enjoying her then ... Moreover, Ibn Zubair also narrated it from the companion Jabir bin 'Abdullah. 

Note: In this hadith, a word of " يَدَ لاَمِسٍ" is used, whose literal meaning is "to touch". But according to the Arabic language, it means "to do sex". This same word of "to touch" has been used in this same meaning of "doing sex" in the Quran itself. 

Quran 2:237:

وَإِن طَلَّقْتُمُوهُنَّ مِن قَبْلِ أَن تَمَسُّوهُنَّ وَقَدْ فَرَضْتُمْ لَهُنَّ فَرِيضَةً فَنِصْفُ مَا فَرَضْتُمْ

And if ye divorce them before touching them (i.e. doing sex), but after the fixation of a dower for them, then the half of the dower (Is due to them)

All Muslim Scholars are unanimous that "touching" here means consummation of marriage by doing sex. 

Are you able to see the contradiction in Islam where on one hand there is a draconian punishment of 'stoning till death' by Islamic Sharia if a married woman engages in sex. But on the other hand, if she is beautiful, then this same Islamic Sharia is teaching to keep enjoying her only for your LUST. 

Contradiction between the Quran and Muhammad

On one side Quran claims that only pure men women are for each other and impure women and men are for each other, but on the other hand, Muhammad is refuting Quran by teaching the companion (the pure man) to keep enjoying his impure wife. 

Quran 24:26:

ٱلْخَبِيثَٰتُ لِلْخَبِيثِينَ وَٱلْخَبِيثُونَ لِلْخَبِيثَٰتِ ۖ وَٱلطَّيِّبَٰتُ لِلطَّيِّبِينَ وَٱلطَّيِّبُونَ لِلطَّيِّبَٰتِ

Impure women are for impure men and impure men for impure women, and pure women are for pure men and pure men for pure women.

This is a clear contradiction between the Quran and Muhammad.

This is the place where everyone should start PONDERING upon it. 

This is the place where everyone has to make a DECISION if such a religion can ever be from any Divine Being in the heavens, which consists of such big contradictions?

Another proof of Muhammad's contradiction:

Sunan Nisai, 2562:

"The Messenger of Allah said: "There are three at whom Allah will not look on the Day of Resurrection: The one who disobeys his parents, the woman who imitates men in her outward appearance, and the cuckold (i.e. a man whose wife is sexually unfaithful). 

It is another proof of Muhammad's contradiction. He said one thing on one point, and said the contradictory thing on another point. He was a human and thus he made such human mistakes. 

The issue of Parentage of the child

The next issue if about the parentage of the child, which becomes absolutely impossible in this case if she is getting a child from her husband or from other men who are touching (having sex with) her.

When Muslims are asked why Islam gives such draconian punishments like 'stoning to death', then Muslims brags proudly that Islam wants to protect the parentage of the child, so that he/she does not stay with non-Mahram brothers/sisters under the same roof in one house. 

But do these Muslims realize that a child of such a beautiful woman from another men is non-Mahram to other wives and all daughters of that husband, but still that husband had to give him his name and keep him along with his other wives and all daughters in the same house? 

Why Muslims are not able to see these logical contradictions in their religion? 


These contradictions are occurring only due to this reason while no so-called Allah is present in the heavens, and it was Muhammad himself who was making the revelations on his own.

Contradiction occurs only due to 'human errors', and we see contradictions in Islam while it has not been made by any God, but by a human (i.e. by Muhammad). 

1st excuse from Islam apologists: This hadith is only about a barren women 

An Islam apologist wrote:

Imam Abu Dawud recorded this hadith under the chapter of: "Prohibition Of Marrying Women Who Do Not Give Birth". This means that there will occur no problem of parentage while keep on enjoying her as a wife. 


There is absolutely no indication present in this hadith itself that it is only about those beautiful women who are barren. Not only in the version of Ibn Abbas, but in all other versions of this hadith have absolutely no indication of barren women. Therefore, it means nothing if Abu Dawud recorded it in such a chapter about barren women. No angel came to Abu Dawud to tell him directly that this hadith was only about barren women. 

Moreover, if you think logically, then again you will see that many pairs don't get children despite trying for many years. But then after several years, the wife indeed gets pregnant. There was no way possible in that era to say it with surety that any woman was barren. 

Moreover, even in case of a barren wife, you don't allow her to start doing sex with other men, and you still keep on calling her a 'pure woman' who is suitable for a 'pure religious husband' like you. 

2nd Excuse: The Prophet didn't 'stone her to death' while no 4 witnesses were present


Please be aware of these tactics of Islam apologists. They first make it an issue of 'stoning her to death', and then start defending Muhammad by making excuse that he could not do it while no 4 witnesses were present. 

No, it is not a matter of stoning her to death, but it is simply a matter of 'divorcing' her and separating from her. And for that the husband did not need any 4 witnesses.

The husband could have simply divorced her, as the Prophet himself suggested to him in this same hadith.

But when the man showed his interest in her beauty, then the Prophet allowed him to keep on fulfilling his LUST with such a wife who commits fornication with other men.