All Prophecies of the Last Hour from Muhammad are FALSE

Dear people!

Please use your mind and don't let yourself be deceived by the propaganda of Islamic Preachers. 

Please remember:

• The 3rd world war is not going to send humans to the Stone Age, but it is going to wipe out the human race.
• Atomic and hydrogen weapons are so powerful today, that they have the ability to destroy this whole world several times. 
• The entire world will become inhabitable for human life for the next thousands of years.  

But Muhammad was telling fantasy prophecies that:

• After an apocalyptic great battle (Al-Malhama Al-Kubra), Dajjal will appear, and he will go to all cities of the world (except Mecca and Medina, where he will not be able to enter). Jews and many others will join his army. 
• And then Jesus will also appear. And Muslims will still be alive to join his army. And they will kill Dajjal and the Jews. 
• And then wealth will become abundant, and no one will take Zakat. 
• And in the last step, the land of Arabia will become meadows and rivers. 

But these prophecies are false. After the nuclear war, There will be no cities left which could be visited by Dajjal. And no Jews or other people will be left to join Dajjal's army. 

Similarly, no Muslims will be left to join the army of Jesus. And no Mecca or Medina will be left. And the whole land of Arabia will be inhabitable for the human race. 

(1) Muhammad's Prophecy: Muslims will be fighting on Horses

Also, Muhammad says everyone would be fighting on horses instead of using modern stuff such as aeroplanes or nuclear weapons. Just more evidence that Muhammad was making up stories to keep his people interested.

Sahih Muslim, 2899a:

... They will, therefore, throw away what would be in their hands and go forward sending ten horsemen, as a scouting party. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: I know their names and the names of their forefathers and the color of their horses. They will be the best horsemen on the surface of the earth on that day or amongst the best horsemen on the surface of the earth on that day.

Comments:

Any sane person will come only to the conclusion that these prophecies are only fantasy stories, and they are not proving Muhammad to be a true prophet, but they are only proving Muhammad to be a false prophet. 

Unfortunately, the reverse is happening in the practical world. Due to the huge power of Propaganda & Deception of Islamic preachers, millions of simple Muslims are becoming more steadfast in their belief in Allah/Muhammad, and thousands of non-Muslims are accepting Islam in the name of the so-called true prophecies of Muhammad.

(2) The prophecy of the land of Arabia becoming meadows and river

Muslim preachers are today doing non-stop propaganda that the land of Arabia is becoming green after a few rainfalls. But this prophecy is false. 

The SEQUENCE of events according to the Hadith is as follows:

1. First, there will be an apocalyptic great battle known as Al-Malhama Al-Kubra, which in today's context means a global nuclear war.
2. Next, Jesus will appear, ushering in an era of long-term reign during which wealth will become abundant.
3. And the land of Arabia will turn into meadows and rivers only in that era of Jesus.  

Sahih Muslim, 157c:

And this abundance of wealth will take place during the reign of Jesus.

Bukhari, 2476:

Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "The Hour will not be established until the son of Mary (i.e. Jesus) descends amongst you as a just ruler, he will break the cross, kill the pigs, and abolish the Jizya tax. Money will be in abundance so that nobody will accept it (as charitable gifts).

How can Islamic preachers directly go to the stage of the land of Arabia becoming meadows, while still neither a great battle has taken place, nor Jesus has come, nor wealth has become abundant?

In the case of nuclear war, all the green spots (which are present today in Saudi Arabia due to wheather change and some rainfall) are going to vanish. And Saudi Arabia is going to become inhabitable for the next thousands of years. 

Moreover, see this (link):

• Recent research shows that overall, aridity is increasing throughout the Middle East, including in most parts of Saudi Arabia. Only one area of Eastern Saudi Arabia is getting comparatively more rainfall compared to previous years and this is not near Mecca/Medina (see Fig 9 - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00704-020-03370-6)

• The fact that many regions of Saudi Arabia are getting less rainfall is such that it is actually threatening biodiversity of plants there (Research Gate)

• A study done in Saudi Arabia recommends “the necessity of activating water-harvesting projects to make the most of varying rainfall rates, rationalize water consumption”. This is hardly consistent with an abundance of meadows and rivers. (https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/214783)

PS:

Present-day Muslims have also done some Tehrif (Distortion) in translating this Hadith. They translated the word تَعُودَ as "revert" (i.e. ... till the land of Arabia REVERTS meadows and rivers). By changing this translation, they want to prove a Prophetic Miracle, i.e. modern science showed that the land or Arabia was green several thousand years ago and nobody knew about it. Thus, they claim that it was a miracle of the Prophet and he know about the past state of Arabia through revelation). 

However, this prophetic miracle claim is false, while the word تَعُودَ is also used in sense of "becoming" somthing, even if it was not in that state prior. Lane's gives the example of "وَدِدْتُ أَنَّ هٰذَا اللَّبَنَ يَعُودُ قَطِرَانًا" which means "I wish that this milk would become tar", which certainly doesn't mean the milk used to be tar. 

As far as proof of Distortion by present-day Muslims is concerned, then please read the details here.

(3) Debunking the Euphrates River Hadith

Another favourite of Islamic preachers is the hadith of the Euphrates River, through which they are deceiving millions of innocent people. 

Sahih Muslim, 2894a:

Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: The Last Hour would not come before the Euphrates uncovers a mountain of gold, for which people would fight. Ninety-nine out of each one hundred would die but every man amongst them would say that perhaps he would be the one who would be saved (and thus possess this gold).

In another hadith, it has been made clear that 99 out of 100 deaths will take place after the Great Battle (Sahih Muslim, 2899a). So, do you think that gold will have any value after the Great Nuclear War?

And no mountains of gold have been found in the Euphrates river, but only a small amount. And no one is fighting over it, but companies are extracting it peacefully. 

(4) Buttocks of the Women of Dhi-al-Khalasaa 

Here is the prophecy: 

Sahih Bukhari, 7116:

Allah's Messenger said, "The Hour will not be established till the buttocks of the women of the tribe of Daus move while going round (the statue of) Dhi-al-Khalasa."

Our Response: 

Why would a prophet talk about the buttocks of women? In one hadith, Muhammad mentioned "flags in buttocks" [Sahih Muslim 1738a]. Couldn't he just have said that the end times would come when women began to circle around the statue of Dhi-al-Khalasa? Does such language befit a prophet of a divine religion?

Furthermore, this prophecy has proven to be false, as the statue of Dhi-al-Khalasa no longer exists and is not worshiped by anyone. This also implies that if one prophecy in the Hadith is false, none of the other prophecies can be trusted.

However, Islamic Apologists came up with the following proofs, and claimed that the prophecy is indeed true (source):

The Historian in his work “Akhbār Makkah” witness, In the 1800s, Daws tribe began worshiping and sacrificing to ḏūl ḵhalaṣa, a building with walls and a tree When King ʿAbdul ʿAzīz took control of the Ḥijāz area, he sent military campaign in 1925 to demolish the idol (source). 

Multiple other contemporary Historians witnessed the worshiping of ḏūl ḵhalaṣa including:

(1) Uṯhmān ibn Bishr (1780 - 1871 AD)in his ʿUnwān al-Majd fī Taʾrīkh Najd (source)

(2) Fawzān al-Sābiq (1859 - 1954 AD) in “al-Bayān wa-al-Ishhār li-kashf zaygh al-mulḥid al-Ḥājj Mukhtār” (source).

(3) Muḥammad ibn Balīhad An-Najdī (1893 - 1957 AD) in his commentary on Kitāb Ṣifat Jazīratul ʿArab (source). 

(4) Multiple other contemporary Historians witnessed the worshiping of ḏūl ḵhalaṣa including, ʿUṯhmān ibn Bishr (1780 - 1871 AD)in his ʿUnwān al-Majd fī Taʾrīkh Najd (source).

(5) Even the non-Muslim Historian writes it (source). 

And here a video the remains of Dhi-al-Khalasa. 

Our Response:

Regrettably, Islamists are employing deceptive tactics. The so-called evidence cited is entirely fabricated.

Islamists claimed above that the book "Akhbar Mecca, pp. 381" states: "When King Abd Al Azeez took control of the Hijaz area, he sent military campaigns to subdue tribes and bring them under his control. A campaign was sent to the mountains of Daws in 1925."

However, there is a significant problem with this claim. The issue is that the Kaba of Dhi-al-Khalasa was not located in the Hijaz area but in Yemen, a region that was never under the control of King Abd al-Aziz. This factual discrepancy undermines the credibility of the entire claim.

Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 4357:
Dhul-l--Khulasa was a house in Yemen belonging to the tribe of Khatham and Bajaila, and in it there were idols which were worshipped, and it was called Al-Ka`ba." Jarir went there, burnt it with fire and dismantled it. 

Moreover, according to the video, this alleged ruin is present in "Tabalah (Saudi Arabia)", and google maps show that this place is at least 400 km away from the closest border of Yemen. 

Furthermore, according to Sahih Bukhari, Jarir, a companion of Prophet Muhammad, set the building ablaze. However, the video shows images of animals etched into the stones, inconsistent with the claim that the structure was burned and dismantled. It's essential to note that numerous pre-Islamic ruins with inscriptions exist throughout the Arabian region, such as the Bir Hima Rock Inscriptions in Saudi Arabia, featuring similar animal images on stones.

Additionally, why do these images depict animals rather than the supposed statue of Dhi-al-Khalasa?

Furthermore, if this site in Yemen were indeed a major place of pilgrimage, akin to a Kaaba, it would need to support large numbers of visitors. Yet, the small, fragmented remains on top of the hill indicate that the site wasn't designed to handle significant crowds—not even hundreds, let alone thousands. The absence of "flat land" on the hilltop raises doubts about its capacity to host large gatherings. This raises questions about the credibility of claims that it served as a major religious site.

Additionally, if Jarir dismantled the site and then King Abdul Aziz reportedly dismantled it again, how is it possible that remnants of the walls, along with these animal images, are still intact?

Unfortunately, Islamic apologists fabricate numerous lies and successfully disseminate them through propaganda, leading millions of innocent people to believe in such prophecies and convert to Islam.

(5) Fifty women for one man

Sahih Bukhari, 81:

Allah's Messenger said: From among the portents of the Hour are (the following): ... Women will increase in number and men will decrease in number so much so that fifty women will be looked after by one man.

Comments:

Science has already defeated Muhammad. Science has already advanced to that stage where it is fully in a position to avoid any such imbalance of 1 man to 50 women. Actually, science has produced results, which are opposite to Muhammad’s prediction, and the number of women is less than men today.

(6) When a slave girl gives birth to her master

Sahih Bukhari, 50:

(Allah’s Messenger said: The hour will come) When a slave (lady) gives birth to her master.

Comments:

But the non-religious Western people already defeated Allah and his Qiyyamah, while they all together abolished slavery. Thus, there is no slave woman left to give birth to her master.

An apologist came up with this excuse:

This hadith means that mothers will give birth to children that will enslave them. Like, children being so spoiled to the point they are treating their parents as slaves. Basically, a downfall of morality.

A lame excuse, while Muhammad could have simply told it in normal words that a mother (either a slave or a free Woman) would give birth to a child, who would act like a master to her.

That is why none of the Muslims of the last 1400 years ever came up with this meaning of this Hadith, and kept it to slave mothers only, and not to the free Muslim women and their children. 

(7) The last hour would come when a young boy in Muhammad's company would die

Comments:

No comments are needed. 

If just one prophecy is incorrect, then it invalidates the entirety of Islam and the remaining 99.99% of prophecies

Dear Readers,

Islamic apologists often waste your time by presenting dozens of ambiguous prophecies one after another. They attempt to mislead you by suggesting that these vague predictions contain hidden wisdom or meaning.

To avoid being drawn into this time-consuming trap, use this strategy:

Challenge: If a single prophecy is proven wrong, it undermines the entire foundation of Islam.

Islamic proponents claim that their god, Allah, is infallible, meaning that every prophecy must be accurate. Ask them to address the prophecy about the Last Hour that has been proven false. They will likely evade the question and bombard you with other vague prophecies to distract and confuse you. Don't let them get away with it—hold them accountable, and don't waste your valuable time with their diversions.

A LIST of all prophecies in the Quran and the Hadith

While it's generally a waste of time, if you're interested, you can find a list of numerous prophecies along with brief refutations in these WikiIslam articles:

• Prophecies in the Quran
• 133 Prophecies in the Hadith

Keep in mind, these lists are likely incomplete, as new prophetic claims seem to pop up all the time. If you have further questions or need more information, feel free to visit our ex-Muslim subreddit to discuss.