The blessed meat of Madam Chicken spreads diseases just like that of pork.

Bird flu is currently spreading in the U.S., causing the price of a dozen eggs to reach $10. In an advanced country like the United States, gut bacteria were found in 97% of chicken (link). 

The pure and halal blessed diet of Madam Chicken:

Madam Chicken effortlessly digests all kinds of insects, small snakes, scorpions, lizards, etc., without even a burp. She then expresses gratitude to Allah for providing this pure and halal blessed diet.

Even pigs do not consume as many insects, snakes, lizards, and scorpions as Madam Chicken does.

Rape of Madam Chicken by 20 Rooster

Today, the so-called honour (غيرة) of roosters was also exposed when viral videos on the internet showed dozens of overly enthusiastic roosters aggressively chasing and RAPING a single Madam Chicken (link). 

In comparison, pigs are true Gentlemen, as they content with only consensual sexual interactions and express gratitude for that.

The same is true about goats. Multiple bucks (male goats9 can mate with the same female goat (doe) in a flock:

  • Estrus Timing: A female goat (doe) is only receptive to mating when she is in heat. 
  • Dominance Hierarchy: The dominant buck usually gets the first opportunity to mate, but if other bucks are present and the doe remains in heat, she may be mounted by multiple males.
  • Fertility Considerations: While multiple bucks may mate with the same doe, only one buck’s sperm will fertilize her egg. However, if she mates with different bucks during the same heat cycle, there is a small chance of multiple paternity (twins or triplets from different fathers), though this is rare in goats.

Detailed Article:

A non-Muslim woman asked this question:

I have been married to a somewhat practising Muslim for 8 years. Is there a good reason why he cannot eat any form of pork barring religious reasons? Is there a logical, scientific reaoson why he cant?

Reply:

Muslim community suffers from extreme aversion against pigs. This came due to religious indoctrination, where Islam prohibited eating pig meat and declared it impure (Quran 6:145). 

Islamic preachers make different claims as to why Islam prohibited it, like:

  • They claim that Islam prohibits it while pig meat is harmful to humans and causes diseases. However, not only pigs eat dirty things, but the same is true about chickens as well. Yes, chickens also eat various insects, including small snakes, lizards, worms, and other reptiles, but they still stay Halal for Muslims. It destroys the excuse of Islamic preachers about eating dirty things. 
  • They also claim that male pigs have no honour (غيرة) and they let other pigs to have sex with their female mates. They claim that European men also have no honour (غيرة) and let other men to have sex with their women as they consume pork. However, there are several YouTube videos where dozens of male chickens (roosters) were RAPING one female chicken (and even killer her during this process). As compared to these rapists chickens, pigs only involve in consensual sexual activities. 
  • Islamic preachers object that pigs live in muck and sometimes eat their own feces. However, this is only true for pigs raised in farms. Wild pigs do not live in muck and do not eat their own faeces. Similarly, chickens also eat their own feces (source), and cows that live in cowsheds practically live in their own feces. Cows also eat their placenta after giving birth. Furthermore, there are goats that drink their own urine (source), yet they are still considered halal in Islam.
  • It is objected that pork contains bacteria, but the same is true for chicken meat, which also contains harmful bacteria. Therefore, both types of meat must be cooked before consumption. Since no bacteria can survive heat, cooked pork meat is just as safe as chicken or beef.

From a historical perspective, Islamic law on pork consumption likely came from Judaism:

A similar story is found in a non-Muslim source, namely the fifth-century ecclesiastical history by Sozomen, which claims that the Ishmaelites, descendants of Abraham and Hagar and possibly found further to the north, assumed the name of Saracens pretending to descend from Sara, the wife of Abraham. Like the Jews, this group practised circumcision and refrained from the use of pork.

Reference: Page 178 - Pre-Islamic Arabia Societies, Politics, Cults and Identities during Late Antiquity - Valentina A. Grasso - Cambridge University Press (2023)

Muhammad copied this ruling from Judaism. And some evidence suggests that Jews declared it impermissible while their enemies (Philistines) used to eat pig meat mainly, and it was due to tribal politics. 

We strongly suggest all readers to please watch this video, which is incredibly informative about the evolutionary practices of raising pigs to religious taboos, right from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age. 

 

If you have children with your Muslim husband, then don't let him indoctrinate them:

Despite leaving Islam and becoming ex-Muslims for several years, we still struggled with consuming pork products because of the ingrained teachings from our childhood. Similarly, although we had abandoned Islam, we found ourselves retaining a deep-seated aversion towards homosexual individuals. Through extensive study and exposure to scientific research, we eventually came to recognize that homosexuality is a natural aspect of human diversity. However, it took a long time and concerted effort to overcome the lingering prejudice instilled in us since childhood.

Our advice to you is to protect your children from such insidious indoctrination. 

Not all Muslims are bad. If they respect you and your choices, then there is no harm in marrying them. But don't compromise on humanity and human values for the sake of such a relationship. 

 

Pork is not the worst part:

The prohibition of pork, alcohol, and all meat that wasn't prepared the Halal way, also plays the role of limiting events where Muslims can interact and share with non-Muslims. 

It acts as a one-way social barrier. Muslim events can easily receive outsiders, in a context where non-Islamic cultural influences are not a threat, but food restriction will limit the events where a Muslim is in an outsider event, where he would be more exposed to non-Islamic cultural influences.

The Jews likely did this for the same reason. They chose to circumcise their young, avoid pork, eat Kosher meat, and do other things to set them apart from non-Jews. In turn, this isolated them and severely limited their interaction with people outside.

One could say that the prohibition of fornication also acts as a social barrier. It ensures people don’t run off and have sex with people outside of their group, thus keeping the structure going. So, they prohibit fornication for the sole purpose of ensuring that people “have sex with the right people”. This is also a probable reason why cousin marriage is/was so popular within the two groups of people (cousin marriage was likely practised a lot in the Jewish community historically as well).

 

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →