Can you imagine a mother, her heart pounding with love, being forced to kill her own newborn baby? It’s unthinkable, a nightmare that rips your soul apart. But in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, this horror is real, and it’s happening right now.

Why? Why would a mother do something so heartbreaking?

Because the brutal laws of Islam, cloaked in the name of "Zina" (fornication), push these women to the edge. They’re not just fighting for their lives; they’re fighting to shield their families from shame in a society that brands their babies as stains on honor. These mothers face an impossible choice: kill their child or face punishment, disgrace, or even death.

The Dawn newspaper, Pakistan’s most trusted English daily, reported a gut-wrenching truth: in 2019 alone, 375 newborn babies were found dead, tossed like trash in the streets of Karachi. Three hundred seventy-five tiny lives, snuffed out before they could even cry for their mothers. And that’s just one city, one year. The real number across Pakistan? It’s too painful to guess.

Now compare this to Western countries. There, no baby is labeled "illegitimate" or "bastard." Mothers can hold their children close, supported by laws and communities that cherish every life. Teenage moms can choose adoption without fear, knowing their babies will find loving homes. Why? Because there are no bloodthirsty punishments for love or mistakes. Life is valued, not condemned.

But in Pakistan, Islamic rulings make this impossible.

Moreover, look at this Islamic Ruling:

Muwatta Malik Book 41, Hadith 15:

Malik said, "The position with us about a woman who is found to be pregnant and has no husband and she says, 'I was forced,' or she says, 'I was married,' is that it is not accepted from her and the hadd is inflicted on her unless she has a clear proof of what she claims about the marriage or that she was forced or she comes bleeding if she was a virgin or she calls out for help so that someone comes to her and she is in that state or what resembles it of the situation in which the violation occurred." He said, "If she does not produce any of those, the hadd is inflicted on her and what she claims of that is not accepted from her."

And the largest Fatwa Website (run by Saudi Salafi Muftis) Islam Q&A writes in its fatwa (link):

Rape is essentially zina (fornication or adultery) and is proven in the same way as zina is proven, which is with four witnesses. The punishment is one hundred lashes if the man was a virgin and stoning if he was previously married ...  Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr (may Allah have mercy on him) said: She is not to be punished if it is proven that he forced her and overpowered her. That may be known from her having screamed and shouted for help. (Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146 ) ...  

Can you imagine the terror of a raped woman, or even a small girl, trying to meet these impossible demands? Most rapes happen in secret, far from witnesses. Blood doesn’t always show, and shame silences cries for help. Worse, most women don’t even know these rules exist. Their first instinct is to hide, to protect themselves from families who might kill them in the name of "Ghairah" (honor). And what about little girls raped by their fathers, brothers, uncles, or mullahs in Quran schools? How can a child scream loud enough or show blood in public to save herself from lashes or death?

This isn’t justice. It’s a system that crushes the innocent.

And it doesn’t stop there. The fear of these laws drives 2.25 million women to illegal abortions every year in Pakistani hospitals (link). That’s 2.25 million lives ended before they could begin, all because mothers know they can’t keep their babies in a society that punishes love with death. Without these cruel laws, so many of these women would have held their children close, loved them, raised them. But fear stole that chance.

Then there’s the horror of honor killings. In just three years, 2,000 girls were murdered in Pakistan for suspected relationships with boys (link). Two thousand young women, their dreams and futures erased, all in the name of "Ghairah." And that’s only the cases we know about. Countless others are tortured in silence, beaten or locked away by their own families, their pain hidden from the world. Boys, too, are killed for daring to love, their deaths counted separately, their stories just as tragic.

No one knows the full scale of this suffering. How many girls endure unspeakable abuse in the name of honor? How many families turn on their own daughters, sisters, and wives, driven by a twisted sense of shame? The numbers we have are just the surface of a deep, dark wound.

You can’t cage human nature with laws that thirst for blood. Love, desire, and connection are part of being human, but Islam’s harsh rulings try to stamp them out. They don’t protect families; they tear them apart. They don’t honor life; they destroy it. Every dead baby, every aborted dream, every murdered girl screams the same truth: these laws are not about God or morality. They’re about control, and they’re breaking Pakistan’s heart.

We can’t stay silent. These mothers, these girls, these babies deserve better. They deserve a world where love isn’t a crime, where a child’s life isn’t a curse, where a woman’s voice is heard. Pakistan must face this pain and choose humanity over cruelty. The world is watching, and our silence is betrayal. Let’s stand for those who can’t, for the babies lost, for the mothers broken, for the girls silenced. Their lives demand our outrage, our action, our love.

Already Read the Article?

...but your task is still not finished.

Dear seeker of truth,
Reading about the flaws in a belief system is only the first step. To truly break free from indoctrination and reach a final, unshakable conclusion, you must apply these four critical tests to what you've just read.

Test 1: Divine Revelation or Human Drama?

The Core Challenge:
God does not appear before us, nor do His angels manifest themselves, and He performs no miracles today like the claims made in the tales of ancient times. Despite this absence, we are still demanded to recognise God through His "commands"  only. 
Let us examine these commands, and see if they give the impression of Divine Revelation, or of "Human Drama."

Please reflect:

  • Do the teachings in this article display flawless wisdom, justice, consistency, and coherence that could only come from an Omniscient Creator?
  • Or do they resemble the kinds of laws, contradictions, exceptions, and inconsistencies that one would expect from ordinary human decision-making?

Test 2: Would These Same Arguments Also Defend a False Prophet?

Imagine a man in a different era who claims to be a prophet. He marries multiple women, claims divine permission for his personal desires, issues harsh punishments, and makes scientific errors—acting exactly like Muhammad. How would you distinguish this hypothetical false prophet from Muhammad?

The truth is, Islamic apologists would easily spot him as a fraud or a cult leader, using the exact same logical critiques you just read. Yet, when Muhammad does these exact same things, apologists invent endless rationalizations to defend him.

The Rule of Logic: If your defense of a prophet works equally well to defend a proven fraud or a cult leader, your defense is not based on evidence. It is based on "special pleading", giving one man a free pass that you would never give anyone else.

Test 3: Just One Confirmed Error Is Enough

Islam makes an extraordinary claim that Allah exists, is absolutely perfect, and cannot make even a single mistake. Therefore, if even one confirmed error, injustice, or flaw is found in Islam, its entire claim to divine perfection collapses. The remaining 99.99% of the religion cannot save that claim. You cannot simply argue, "But everything else is correct."

Test 4: The "Unbiased AI" Evaluation

Artificial Intelligence models are programmed to be highly deferential toward major world religions. If you ask an AI to critique the Quran, it will  treat Islamic theology as unquestionable facts rather than claims to be tested. This creates a false "tie" in debates.

To get a truly objective, logical evaluation of the article you just read, you must force the AI to drop its religious deference. Read the prompt below, then click the button to copy it. Paste it into your AI chat before asking it to analyze the article.

When reviewing the article, keep the following principles in mind:
The Qur'an and Hadith cannot be used as evidence of their own divine origin. They are claims whose origin is being examined. Your task is to evaluate whether the Qur'an, Sunnah, and Islamic legal system are better explained as Divine Revelation or as human authorship. Therefore:
• Treat the Qur'an and Hadith as claims, not proof.
• Evaluate the article using logic, internal consistency, factual accuracy, and principles of justice.
• Treat scholarly interpretations as arguments in favor of Islam, not as binding authority.
Based on these principles, answer this question: Do the objections raised in the article expose flaws that reason and justice cannot reconcile, or do the strongest Muslim apologetic arguments successfully answer those objections?

Note: The AI’s response is not a final judgement. The final decision must be made by you, using your own reason and understanding. 

About the Author & This Website

About the Authors: 

The ideas, arguments, research, article structure, and final conclusions are my own. AI tools are used only as editorial assistants to improve grammar, wording, readability, and clarity.

About the Website:

This website is not a “neutral” or purely academic platform. Think of a courtroom, where a judge or jury listens to two opposing sides. We represent one side. It is not our role to be neutral. Our responsibility is to present our case honestly, with arguments and evidence.

You, the reader, are the judge and jury. Your role is to remain fair, to examine all sides, reflect carefully, and then reach your own conclusion with sincerity.

Read more →